ArticleCommunications medicine2024
A register-based cohort study on the effectiveness and Safety of anti-PCSK9 treatment in persons with hyperlipidemia.
Article in Communications medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing Lipid Management: Saudi Heart Association Position Statement on PCSK9-targeted Therapies in the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2026Article
- Sepsis-Induced Endothelial Barrier Dysfunction: Mechanisms, Pathology, and Therapeutic Advances.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDyslipidemia is a known risk factor for cardiovascular disease. While statins are the primary treatment, some individuals require additional lipid-lowering therapies, such as proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors. Alirocumab and evolocumab have shown efficacy in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events (MACE) but have not been directly compared in clinical trials. This study aims to assess the effects of PCSK9 inhibitors on LDL-C levels and evaluate the impact of a mandated switch from alirocumab to evolocumab.
methodsTaking advantage of the mandated switch in PCSK9 treatment in Denmark, we conducted a register-based cohort study of 907 individuals with dyslipidemia treated with PCSK9 inhibitors in the Capital Region of Denmark from 2016 to 2022. We analyzed LDL-C levels, treatment retention, and MACE, adjusting for variables such as age, sex, dose, and concurrent lipid-lowering medications.
resultsWe show that PCSK9 inhibitors treatment resulted in a 49% reduction in LDL-C levels. Following a mandated switch from alirocumab to evolocumab, no significant difference was observed in LDL-C levels or adverse clinical outcomes, including MACE. Treatment discontinuation was most likely within the first 100 days, and no significant difference in discontinuation rates was found between the two drugs.
conclusionsOur study demonstrates that both alirocumab and evolocumab are effective in significantly reducing LDL-C levels in individuals with dyslipidemia. The mandated switch from alirocumab to evolocumab did not result in significant changes in LDL-C or clinical outcomes, suggesting that these treatments can be used interchangeably. These findings support the clinical equivalence of the two PCSK9 inhibitors and may guide therapeutic decisions in lipid management.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.