ReviewFrontiers in immunology2024
Application of graft-derived cell-free DNA for solid organ transplantation.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterizing Early Donor-Derived cfDNA Kinetics in Stable Pediatric Living-Donor Liver Transplant Recipients.Pediatric transplantation · 2026Article
- Donor-derived cell-free DNA in solid organ transplantation: analytical considerations, diagnostic performance, and clinical interpretation.Clinical transplantation and research · 2025Review
- Advances and challenges in the application of donor-derived cell-free DNA for diagnosis and treatment in liver transplantation: a narrative review.BMC surgery · 2025Review
- Advancements in noninvasive techniques for transplant rejection: from biomarker detection to molecular imaging.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- The single-cell revolution in transplantation: high-resolution mapping of graft rejection, tolerance, and injury.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Biomarkers for primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation: a review of current evidence and future prospects.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monitoring the status of grafts and the occurrence of postoperative complications, such as rejection, is crucial for ensuring the success and long-term survival of organ transplants. Traditional histopathological examination, though effective, is an invasive procedure and poses risks of complications, making frequent use impractical. In recent years, graft-derived cell-free DNA (gd-cfDNA) has emerged as a promising non-invasive biomarker. It not only provides early warnings of rejection and other types of graft injury but also offers important information about the effectiveness of immunosuppressive therapy and prognosis. gd-cfDNA shows potential in the monitoring of organ transplants. The early, real-time information on graft injury provided by gd-cfDNA facilitates timely individualized treatment and improves patient outcomes. However, the progress of research on gd-cfDNA varies across different organs. Therefore, this article will comprehensively review the application and findings of gd-cfDNA in monitoring various solid organs, discussing the advantages, limitations, and some future research directions to aid in its clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.