Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39376730›Full record

ArticleTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2024

Evolving Trends in the Management of Duodenal Leaks After Pancreas Transplantation: A Single-Centre Experience.

Samrat Ray, Christian Hobeika, Andrea Norgate, Zaneta Sawicka, Jeffrey Schiff, Gonzalo Sapisochin, Ian D McGilvray, Markus Selzner, Trevor W Reichman, Chaya Shwaartz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Versus Kidney Transplant Alone: Real-World Outcomes in a Propensity-Matched Global Cohort.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Samrat RayAjmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Christian HobeikaAjmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Andrea NorgateAjmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Zaneta SawickaAjmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jeffrey SchiffDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Gonzalo SapisochinAjmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ian D McGilvrayAjmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Markus SelznerAjmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Trevor W ReichmanAjmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Chaya ShwaartzAjmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Duodenal leaks (DL) contribute to most graft losses following pancreas transplantation. However, there is a paucity of literature comparing graft preservation approach versus upfront graft pancreatectomy in these patients. We reviewed all pancreas transplants performed in our institution between 2000 and 2020 and identified the recipients developing DL to compare based on their management: percutaneous drainage vs. operative graft preservation vs. upfront pancreatectomy. Of the 595 patients undergoing pancreas transplantation, 74 (12.4%) developed a duodenal leak with a median follow up of 108 months. Forty-five (61%) were managed by graft preservation strategies, with the rest being treated with upfront graft pancreatectomy. DL managed by graft preservation strategies had similar graft survival rates at 1 and 5-year compared to the matched cohort of population without DL (95% and 59% vs. 91% and 62%; p = 0.78). Multivariate analysis identified male recipient (OR: OR: 6.18; CI95%: 1.26-41.09; p = 0.04) to have higher odds of undergoing an upfront graft pancreatectomy. In appropriately selected recipients with DL, graft preservation strategies utilizing either interventional radiology guided percutaneous drainage or laparotomy with/without repair of leak can achieve comparable long-term graft survival rates compared to recipients without DL.

Indexed as

DrainageGraft SurvivalPancreas TransplantationPancreatectomyAdultAnastomotic LeakDuodenumFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective Studiescomplications after transplantationduodenal leaksgraft preservationgraft salvagepancreas transplantation

Identifiers

PMID39376730
PMCPMC11456492

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.