ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2024
Investigating the impact of COVID-19 lockdowns on fragility fracture risk and bone mineral density in a large observational cohort: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-Term Impact of COVID-19 on Osteoporosis Risk Among Patients Aged ≥50 Years with New-Onset Overweight, Obesity, or Type 2 Diabetes: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2 or COVID-19) led to lockdowns predisposing people to sedentary lifestyles and unhealthy behaviours which may have affected bone mineral density (BMD) and fragility fracture risk. However, limited studies describe such an association. We aimed to investigate how COVID-19 lockdowns has affected BMD and fragility fractures in a large cohort. Methods: Patients were referred to our DXA scanner from 2004 to 2024 and were subsequently categorized as pre- or post-March 23, 2020 (pre- and post-COVID-19) to allow analysis between the groups. Demographic, BMD and compositional data were compared between the two populations. A multivariate logistic regression modelled the odds of reporting a fracture including hip and non-hip fracture. A multiple linear regression was used to model how the lockdown has affected bone density. All analyses were adjusted for confounders. Results: Of 43 799 referrals, 6564 were post-COVID-19. Post-COVID-19 patients had higher non-hip fracture rates (42.0% vs 39.8%), were 3 kg heavier, and had lower left femoral T-scores. Patients referred post-COVID-19 had a statistically significant reduction of -0.23 to their T-score after adjusting for confounders as well as increased risk of getting diagnosed with osteoporosis [odds ratio (OR) 1.49, 95% CI 1.40-1.59]. Patients referred after the pandemic had a reduced odds of any fracture (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.77-0.88), hip (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.88) and non-hip fracture (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.73-0.83). Conclusion: COVID-19 lockdowns may have negatively affected bone; however, this has not translated to an increased fracture risk in our study. Further research is needed with prospective cohorts to corroborate this risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.