ArticleERJ open research2024
Assessing post-COVID-19 respiratory dynamics: a comprehensive analysis of pulmonary function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and bronchodilator response.
Article in ERJ open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of COVID-19 on Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases: A Narrative Review of Long-Term Consequences and Vaccination Strategies.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Bronchial Hyperreactivity in the COVID-19 Era: The Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients with Respiratory Symptoms.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
- Correlations Between Oxygen Consumption, Ventilatory Mechanics, and Lung Ultrasound in Individuals with Post-COVID Syndrome.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has a considerable impact on the global healthcare system. Individuals who have recovered from COVID often experience chronic respiratory symptoms that affect their daily lives. This study aimed to assess respiratory dynamics such as airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and bronchodilator response in post-COVID patients. Methods: This study included 282 adults with respiratory symptoms who underwent provocation tests. The demographic details, clinical symptoms and medical histories were recorded. Baseline spirometry, methacholine challenge tests (MCT) and post-bronchodilator spirometry were performed. Patients were divided into the following four groups: Group 1: non-COVID-19 and negative MCT; Group 2: post-COVID-19 and negative MCT; Group 3: non-COVID-19 and positive MCT; and Group 4: post-COVID-19 and positive MCT. Results: Most post-COVID-19 patients (43.7%) experienced AHR, and wheezing was more common. Patients in Group 4 exhibited increased intensities of dyspnoea, cough and wheezing with the lowest pulmonary function test (PFT) parameters at baseline. Moreover, significant decreases in PFT parameters after the MCT were observed in these patients. Although the prevalence of a low forced expiratory volume in 1 s to forced vital capacity ratio (<70%) was initially 2% in Group 4, it increased to 29% after MCT. No significant differences in allergic history or underlying diseases were observed between the groups. Conclusions: These findings provide comprehensive insights into the AHR and respiratory symptoms of post-COVID-19 individuals, highlighting the characteristics and potential exacerbations in patients with positive MCT results. This emphasises the need of MCT to address respiratory dynamics in post-COVID-19 individuals.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.