Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39378176›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2024

Neural and Computational Mechanisms of Motivation and Decision-making.

Debbie M Yee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Debbie M YeeBrown University.

Funding

Brown Postdoctoral Training Program in Computational PsychiatryT32MH126388 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL J. FRANK, STEPHANIE Ruggiano JONES · 2021 to 2026
$2.1M
Advancing the Research Careers of Women and PEERs in Brain ScienceR25NS124530 · NINDS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI CARLOS D AIZENMAN, Diane Lipscombe · 2022 to 2026
$1.3M
Neurocomputational mechanisms of serotonin, sustained stress, and mental effort allocationK99MH133912 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI YEE, DEBBIE · 2024 to 2025
$230k
Advancing Research Careers in Brain Science Award R25NS124530National Institute of Mental Health Training Program for Computational Psychiatry T32MH126388NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH133912NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH126388NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS124530NSF CAREER 204611
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation is often thought to enhance adaptive decision-making by biasing actions toward rewards and away from punishment. Emerging evidence, however, points to a more nuanced view whereby motivation can both enhance and impair different aspects of decision-making. Model-based approaches have gained prominence over the past decade for developing more precise mechanistic explanations for how incentives impact goal-directed behavior. In this Special Focus, we highlight three studies that demonstrate how computational frameworks help decompose decision processes into constituent cognitive components, as well as formalize when and how motivational factors (e.g., monetary rewards) influence specific cognitive processes, decision-making strategies, and self-report measures. Finally, I conclude with a provocative suggestion based on recent advances in the field: that organisms do not merely seek to maximize the expected value of extrinsic incentives. Instead, they may be optimizing decision-making to achieve a desired internal state (e.g., homeostasis, effort, affect). Future investigation into such internal processes will be a fruitful endeavor for unlocking the cognitive, computational, and neural mechanisms of motivated decision-making.

Indexed as

Decision MakingMotivationAnimalsBrainHumansReward

Identifiers

PMID39378176
PMCPMC11602011

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.