ReviewOpen biology2024
Cell cycle visualization tools to study cardiomyocyte proliferation in real-time.
Review in Open biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- CALIPERS: Cell cycle-aware live imaging for phenotyping experiments and regeneration studies.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Epigenetic Control of Mammalian Cardiomyocyte Proliferation.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Insights into Cardiomyocyte Regeneration from Screening and Transcriptomics Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiomyocytes in the adult human heart are quiescent and those lost following heart injury are not replaced by proliferating survivors. Considerable effort has been made to understand the mechanisms underlying cardiomyocyte cell cycle exit and re-entry, with view to discovering therapeutics that could stimulate cardiomyocyte proliferation and heart regeneration. The advent of large compound libraries and robotic liquid handling platforms has enabled the screening of thousands of conditions in a single experiment but success of these screens depends on the appropriateness and quality of the model used. Quantification of (human) cardiomyocyte proliferation in high throughput has remained problematic because conventional antibody-based staining is costly, technically challenging and does not discriminate between cardiomyocyte division and failure in karyokinesis or cytokinesis. Live cell imaging has provided alternatives that facilitate high-throughput screening but these have other limitations. Here, we (i) review the cell cycle features of cardiomyocytes, (ii) discuss various cell cycle fluorescent reporter systems, and (iii) speculate on what could improve their predictive value in the context of cardiomyocyte proliferation. Finally, we consider how these new methods can be used in combination with state-of-the-art three-dimensional human cardiac organoid platforms to identify pro-proliferative signalling pathways that could stimulate regeneration of the human heart.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.