Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39379104›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2024

Strategies and tactics to reduce the impact of healthcare on climate change: systematic review.

Jeffrey Braithwaite, Carolynn L Smith, Elle Leask, Shalini Wijekulasuriya, Kalissa Brooke-Cowden, Georgia Fisher, Romika Patel, Lisa Pagano, Hania Rahimi-Ardabili, Samantha Spanos and 9 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. From carbon cost to climate care: Greening our intensive care units.World journal of critical care medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Incorporating climate impact in health care decisions: new criteria to be tested in the Netherlands.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Paving the way for green endoscopy in Saudi Arabia: A call for sustainable gastroenterology practice.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Sustainability: the role of the Surgical Center.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2026
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jeffrey BraithwaiteCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia jeffrey.braithwaite@mq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-0296-4957
Carolynn L SmithCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4377-5490
Elle LeaskCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1698-9151
Shalini WijekulasuriyaCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5269-955X
Kalissa Brooke-CowdenCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1209-2961
Georgia FisherCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7252-7800
Romika PatelCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.ORCID 0009-0000-6523-8798
Lisa PaganoCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2869-5671
Hania Rahimi-ArdabiliCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3555-9416
Samantha SpanosCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3734-3907
Christina RojasCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.ORCID 0009-0007-9148-0431
Andrew PartingtonCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2580-3355
Ella McQuillanCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5362-1682
Genevieve DammeryCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8188-712X
Ann CarriganCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2525-9241
Lauren EhrenfeldCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0732-9733
Enrico CoieraNHMRC Partnership Centre for Health System Sustainability, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6444-6584
Johanna WestbrookNHMRC Partnership Centre for Health System Sustainability, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1083-8192
Yvonne ZurynskiCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7744-8717

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review the international literature and assess the ways healthcare systems are mitigating and can mitigate their carbon footprint, which is currently estimated to be more than 4.4% of global emissions.

designSystematic review of empirical studies and grey literature to examine how healthcare services and institutions are limiting their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. DATA SOURCES: Eight databases and authoritative reports were searched from inception dates to November 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Teams of investigators screened relevant publications against the inclusion criteria (eg, in English; discussed impact of healthcare systems on climate change), applying four quality appraisal tools, and results are reported in accordance with PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses).

resultsOf 33 737 publications identified, 32 998 (97.8%) were excluded after title and abstract screening; 536 (72.5%) of the remaining publications were excluded after full text review. Two additional papers were identified, screened, and included through backward citation tracking. The 205 included studies applied empirical (n=88, 42.9%), review (n=60, 29.3%), narrative descriptive (n=53, 25.9%), and multiple (n=4, 2.0%) methods. More than half of the publications (51.5%) addressed the macro level of the healthcare system. Nine themes were identified using inductive analysis: changing clinical and surgical practices (n=107); enacting policies and governance (n=97); managing physical waste (n=83); changing organisational behaviour (n=76); actions of individuals and groups (eg, advocacy, community involvement; n=74); minimising travel and transportation (n=70); using tools for measuring GHG emissions (n=70); reducing emissions related to infrastructure (n=63); and decarbonising the supply chain (n=48).

conclusionsPublications presented various strategies and tactics to reduce GHG emissions. These included changing clinical and surgical practices; using policies such as benchmarking and reporting at a facility level, and financial levers to reduce emissions from procurement; reducing physical waste; changing organisational culture through workforce training; supporting education on the benefits of decarbonisation; and involving patients in care planning. Numerous tools and frameworks were presented for measuring GHG emissions, but implementation and evaluation of the sustainability of initiatives were largely missing. At the macro level, decarbonisation approaches focused on energy grid emissions, infrastructure efficiency, and reducing supply chain emissions, including those from agriculture and supply of food products. Decarbonisation mechanisms at the micro and meso system levels ranged from reducing low value care, to choosing lower GHG options (eg, anaesthetic gases, rescue inhalers), to reducing travel. Based on these strategies and tactics, this study provides a framework to support the decarbonisation of healthcare systems. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42022383719.

Indexed as

Carbon FootprintClimate ChangeDelivery of Health CareGreenhouse GasesHumansGreenhouse Gases

Identifiers

PMID39379104
PMCPMC11459334

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.