Trial reportInternational dental journal2025
Comparison of Two Oral Pastes Containing Triamcinolone and Rhus Coriaria L. for Treating Minor Aphthous Lesions.
Trial report in International dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) is a common oral mucosal lesion. Herbal medicine has been explored to treat this condition. This study compared the effectiveness of two oral pastes containing Triamcinolone and Sumac, for the healing, size, and symptomatology of RAS.
methodsThis triple-blind randomized clinical trial included 60 patients with minor aphthous ulcers. Participants were informed about the study and provided consent. Exclusion criteria consisted of specific medical conditions and medication use. The patients were divided into three groups and received either Sumac adhesive gel, Triadent oral paste, or a placebo. Ulcer size was measured before and after treatment. The medication was prepared using carboxymethylcellulose-based gel and Sumac powder extract. The study was triple-blinded, and the groups were labelled as A, B, and C. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 22, employing repeated measurement, student t test, Kolmogorov-Smirnoff, and one-way ANOVA for quantitative data. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ .05.
resultsA clinical trial involving 59 participants compared the Sumac, Triadent, and placebo groups. The Sumac group exhibited the shortest healing time, significantly reduced lesion size, and lower Visual Analog Scale scores. Triadent took the longest time to heal ulcers. ANOVA test indicated no significant difference in age and gender distribution.
conclusionThis clinical trial evaluated two oral pastes for treating aphthous ulcers and found that the Sumac group achieved faster healing and reduced lesion size compared to the Triadent and control groups. Sumac shows promise as a treatment option, but further studies are necessary to confirm its efficacy and safety. These favourable results support the use of herbal treatments and suggest their potential for broader utilization in managing diseases such as RAS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.