Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39379850›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Educator perspectives on stressors and health: a qualitative study of U.S. K-12 educators in February 2022.

Jennifer M Cavallari, Sierra M Trudel, Natalie R Charamut, Adekemi O Suleiman, Lisa M H Sanetti, Megan N Miskovsky, Matthew E Brennan, Alicia G Dugan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Psychosocial Risk Factors and Burnout Among Teachers: Can Emotional Intelligence Make a Difference?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jennifer M CavallariSchool of Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA. cavallari@uchc.edu.
Sierra M TrudelDepartment of Psychology, Marist College, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA.
Natalie R CharamutNeag School of Education, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Adekemi O SuleimanSchool of Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Lisa M H SanettiNeag School of Education, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Megan N MiskovskyDepartment of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Matthew E BrennanSchool of Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Alicia G DuganSchool of Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.

Funding

CPH-NEW IV - Total Worker HealthU19OH012299 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI CAVALLARI, JENNIFER M · 2021 to 2025
$6.9M
NIOSH CDC HHS U19 OH012299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTeachers experienced increased stressors and stress during the initial onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. While many educators returned to in-person instruction in the 2021-2022 school year, they faced changing job demands and stressors which has important implications for educator well-being. We sought to understand the stressors and health impacts faced by U.S. educators in the 2021-2022 school year, two years following the acute phase of the pandemic.

methodsThirty-four certified educators based in Connecticut, USA participated in four virtual focus groups in February 2022. A semi-structured focus group script, designed by the research team and guided by the job demands-resources model, was administered to understand stressors and stress impacts. Data were transcribed and analyzed using the constant comparative method to identify themes and sub-themes. Themes were summarized based on how many participants mentioned them.

resultsAnalysis of the qualitative data yielded three themes concerning the well-being impacts of stress: physical health and health behaviors, psychological health, and relationships and social well-being behaviors. The majority of educators indicated impacts in these domains with 76% indicating impacts on physical health and health behaviors (e.g. poor sleep, physical exhaustion, lack of exercise, unhealthy eating), 62% indicating impacts on psychological health (e.g. emotional exhaustion, anxiety, negative self-evaluation); and 68% indicating impacts on relationships social well-being behaviors (e.g. connections with family or friends, connections with others, relationships with coworkers). The majority (94%) of educators indicated that stressors from the school or district with the majority (91%) citing stressors related to protocols/expectations (e.g. excessive or increased demands, insufficient or decreased resources) and some (38%) administrators. Over half (62%) indicated personal stressors including personal/home life (41%), high personal expectations (18%), and income (18%). Some (35%) indicated either the pandemic (26%) or safety concerns (9%) were stressors. Some (24%) cited students' parents as a stressor and a few indicated community (12%), students (12%), and state or national level (9%) stressors.

conclusionEducator well-being continued to be impacted in the post-pandemic era. Targeted interventions are needed to reduce school and district-related demands and to address stress-related educator well-being.

Indexed as

COVID-19Focus GroupsQualitative ResearchAdultConnecticutFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational StressSARS-CoV-2School TeachersStress, PsychologicalCOVID-19EducatorsStressWell-being

Identifiers

PMID39379850
PMCPMC11460010

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.