ArticleJournal of translational medicine2024
A genetically informed study reveals modifiable pathways in skin cancer.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus and cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Mendelian randomization studies.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic evidence grading evaluates multisystemic associations and risks of vitiligo.Nature communications · 2025Pooled it
- Mendelian randomization analyses support causal relationships between gut microbiome and longevity.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying modifiable risk factors is essential for the prevention of skin cancer; however, establishing causality can be challenging in conventional epidemiological studies. This study aimed to determine the causal associations of potentially modifiable risk factors with skin cancer using Mendelian randomization (MR).
methodsGenetic instruments for 53 risk factors, including socioeconomic status, dietary and lifestyle factors, anthropometric measures, medication use, and comorbidities, were identified from previous genome-wide association studies. Two-sample MR analyses were performed using summary statistics for three major types of skin cancer: melanoma, basal cell carcinoma (BCC), and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Findings were verified using multiple MR methods under different assumptions and replication datasets.
resultsGenetic liability to sunburn occasions, actinic keratosis, and prior skin cancers was associated with a higher risk of all three types of skin cancer, whereas genetic liability to vitiligo was associated with a lower risk. For specific skin cancer types, genetically predicted higher nevus counts and occupational class were associated with an increased risk of melanoma. Genetic liability to rheumatoid arthritis, type 2 diabetes, and increased physical activity were associated with a lower risk of BCC. Genetically predicated body mass index showed a negative association with BCC, and a positive association with SCC.
conclusionsOur study reaffirmed several previously established risk factors and identified novel potential risk factors for skin cancer. Further work is needed to unravel the biological pathways in different skin cancer types and translate our findings to inform public health policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.