Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39380121›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2024

Process mapping with failure mode and effects analysis to identify determinants of implementation in healthcare settings: a guide.

Eric J Roseen, Anna Natrakul, Bo Kim, Sarabeth Broder-Fingert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of traditional Chinese exercises in cancer patients: a mixed-methods systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. An introduction to implementation science in rehabilitation medicine.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric J RoseenSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Second Floor, Boston, MA, USA. eric.roseen@bmc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3240-6756
Anna NatrakulSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Second Floor, Boston, MA, USA.
Bo KimCenter for Healthcare Optimization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Sarabeth Broder-FingertDepartment of Pediatrics, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.

Funding

Evaluating Implementation of a Patient Navigator Intervention to Improve Access to Diagnostic and Treatment Services for Children with Autism Spectrum DisorderK23MH109673 · NIMH · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI BRODER-FINGERT, SARABETH · 2016 to 2020
$856k
Improving Access to Chiropractic Care for Low Back Pain in Underserved Primary Care Settings: Development and Evaluation of a Multi-level Implementation StrategyK23AT010487 · NCCIH · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI ROSEEN, ERIC J · 2019 to 2023
$839k
NCCIH NIH HHS K23 AT010487NCCIH NIH HHS K23-AT010487NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH109673NIMH NIH HHS K23-MH109673
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenerating and analyzing process maps can help identify and prioritize barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practices in healthcare settings. Guidance on how to systematically apply and report these methods in implementation research is scant. We describe a method combining a qualitative approach to developing process maps with a quantitative evaluation of maps drawn from the quality improvement literature called failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA).

methodsWe provide an outline and guidance for how investigators can use process mapping with FMEA to identify and prioritize barriers when implementing evidence-based clinical interventions. Suggestions for methods and reporting were generated based on established procedures for process mapping with FMEA and through review of original research papers which apply both methods in healthcare settings. We provide case examples to illustrate how this approach can be operationalized in implementation research.

resultsThe methodology of process mapping with FMEA can be divided into four broad phases: 1) formulating a plan, 2) generating process maps to identify and organize barriers over time, 3) prioritizing barriers through FMEA, and 4) devising an implementation strategy to address priority barriers. We identified 14 steps across the four phases. Two illustrative examples are provided. Case 1 describes the implementation of referrals to chiropractic care for adults with low back pain in primary care clinics. Case 2 describes the implementation of a family navigation intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder seeking care in pediatric clinics. For provisional guidance for reporting, we propose the REporting Process mapping and Analysis for Implementation Research (REPAIR) checklist.

conclusionsProcess mapping with FMEA can elucidate barriers and facilitators to successful implementation of evidence-based clinical interventions. This paper provides initial guidance for more systematic applications of this methodology in implementation research. Future research should use a consensus-building approach, such as a multidisciplinary Delphi panel, to further delineate the reporting standards for studies that use process mapping with FMEA.

Indexed as

Failure mode and effects analysisGuidelinesImplementation barriersMethodologyProcess mapping

Identifiers

PMID39380121
PMCPMC11459716

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.