Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39380458›Full record

ReviewANZ journal of surgery2024

Day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review of patient selection factors and identification of potential barriers to same-day discharge.

Jamie Rickward, Iman Hameed, Simon Ho, Shiran Wijeratne

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ANZ journal of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact of Pneumoperitoneum Pressure on Post-Cholecystectomy Pain.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jamie RickwardUniversity of Notre Dame Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0009-0005-8897-6220
Iman HameedWerribee Mercy Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6032-9607
Simon HoWerribee Mercy Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Shiran WijeratneWerribee Mercy Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDay-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DCLC) is a useful tool for minimizing hospital admissions and prolonged presurgical wait times in suitable patient cohorts. There have been many international studies to support this finding and an increasing interest has grown in implementation in Australia. This review aims to provide clarity how to best implement this tool in gallbladder disease patient demographic. OBSERVATIONS: This literature review evaluates studies on day-case cholecystectomy procedures, focusing on patient factors, procedural aspects, surgical morbidity, and systemic implications. It explores inclusion and exclusion criteria for day-case suitability, factors influencing same-day discharge, reasons for hospital admission, pain management, patient quality of life, patient satisfaction, and cost implications.

conclusionsDCLC, when selected judiciously, is a safe alternative to overnight stay procedures for cholecystectomy with comparable surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction, affirming its viability. Strict patient selection criteria can aid in optimizing the successful implementation procedure, reducing unexpected admissions and readmissions and we have demonstrated useful criteria for guidance in establishing day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy protocol at a hospital.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicPatient DischargePatient SelectionAustraliaGallbladder DiseasesHumansLength of StayPatient SatisfactionQuality of Lifecholecystectomydaylaparoscopicpatient dischargepatient satisfactionpatient selectionsurgery

Identifiers

PMID39380458
PMCPMC11713220

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.