Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39380773›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024

Flow cytometry of non-hematopoietic cells in canine effusions.

Federica Sini, Maverick Melega, Francesca Tiziana Cannizzo, Barbara Miniscalco, Paola Valenti, Fulvio Riondato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Beyond the Needle: Is Liquid Biopsy the Future of Veterinary Medicine?International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Federica Sini *Department of Veterinary Sciences, School of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, University of Turin, Grugliasco, TO, Italy.
Maverick Melega *Department of Veterinary Sciences, School of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, University of Turin, Grugliasco, TO, Italy.
Francesca Tiziana CannizzoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, School of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, University of Turin, Grugliasco, TO, Italy.
Barbara MiniscalcoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, School of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, University of Turin, Grugliasco, TO, Italy.
Paola ValentiClinica Veterinaria Malpensa AniCura, Samarate, VA, Italy.
Fulvio RiondatoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, School of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, University of Turin, Grugliasco, TO, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of non-hematopoietic cells in effusions is a diagnostic challenge in cytology. Biopsies from mesothelium or primary lesions are infrequently performed in clinical settings and immunochemistry on smears or immunohistochemistry on cell blocks are the most common ancillary test to refine the cytological diagnosis. Cavitary effusions are an ideal matrix for flow cytometry and the availability of a cytometric panel to describe non-hematopoietic cells would represent a useful tool. Here we present the results of the flow cytometric and immunohistochemical determination of cytokeratin (CK), vimentin (VIM) and desmin (DES) in 36 canine effusions. The concordance between the two methods was perfect for CK (100%), substantial for VIM (77.8%), and almost perfect for DES (97.2%). The panel was interpreted to define the epithelial (CK+VIM-DES-), mesothelial (CK+VIM+DES+), or mesenchymal (CK-VIM+DES-) origin of the cells. Unexpected profiles were considered doubtful and observed patterns were individually discussed. The concordance of the panel interpretation between two methods was 75%. The evaluation of discordant and doubtful cases suggests a lower sensitivity of flow cytometry in detecting VIM expression and revealed a high frequency of VIM+ epithelial cells, variable expression of VIM in mesothelial cells, and an important role of DES in excluding an epithelial origin when positive. Multicentric studies based on histopathological diagnoses are necessary to confirm these findings and evaluate the diagnostic utility of the panel to refine cytological diagnosis. Our results show that flow cytometry can be a timesaving alternative to IHC on cell blocks in clinical settings to detect CK, VIM and DES expression. The interpretation of the panel is similar in most cases; however, occasional discordant results, particularly for VIM, may occur.

Indexed as

carcinomacell blockcytokeratindesmineffusionflow cytometrymesotheliomavimentin

Identifiers

PMID39380773
PMCPMC11458718

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.