Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39380970›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024

Evaluation and Management of Glenohumeral Instability in Adolescent Patients: An Expert Consensus Statement.

Andrew T Fithian, Eric W Edmonds, Anthony C Egger, Carl W Nissen, James D Bomar, Matthew W Veerkamp, Rajul Gupta, PRiSM Shoulder Research Interest Group, Shital N Parikh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Physical Exam for Athletic Shoulder Injuries in Adolescent Patients.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrew T FithianDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, California, USA.
Eric W EdmondsDivison of Orthopedic Surgery, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5724-5645
Anthony C EggerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Carl W NissenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7727-622X
James D BomarDivison of Orthopedic Surgery, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California, USA.
Matthew W VeerkampDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Rajul GuptaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
PRiSM Shoulder Research Interest Group
Shital N ParikhDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Management of glenohumeral instability in the adolescent population can be both challenging and controversial. There are no current guidelines for optimal management of glenohumeral instability in this population (unidirectional or multidirectional), and the cutoff ages for transition to adult treatment are not known. Purpose: To develop consensus-based guidelines for the management of glenohumeral instability in adolescents. Study Design: Consensus statement. Methods: A 26-question, multiple-choice survey was developed after 2 rounds of iterations and was submitted to the orthopaedic surgeons of the Pediatric Research in Sports Medicine (PRiSM) Society. The survey comprised 3 sections-demographics, practice setting, and decision-making-and included cutoff ages and management in 5 specific case scenarios. Consensus-based guidelines were generated with 66% response agreement. An indication score was then applied to each response related to more aggressive management to determine if variables related to consensus (or lack thereof) could be identified. Results: A total of 54 responses were returned. Of the respondents, 59% were from academic practice, 84% were pediatric orthopaedic fellowship trained, and 46% performed >25 shoulder instability cases per year. In the setting of first-time anterior shoulder dislocation, nonoperative treatment was preferred for boys aged <14 years and girls aged <13 years. Besides age, proximal humerus physeal status, injury mechanism, sport, and presence of bony injury affected treatment selection. The presence of a Bankart lesion was an indication for stabilization in first-time dislocations for contact athletes with a closing or closed physis, but not in patients with an open physis or noncontact injury mechanisms. For recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation, stabilization was preferred irrespective of physis status. Initial nonoperative treatment was preferred for multidirectional instability. Conclusion: In the setting of first-time anterior shoulder dislocation in patients with open physes, nonoperative treatment was preferred for boys <14 years and girls <13 years. Future multicenter prospective studies focusing on outcomes would help to validate current practice patterns, especially in scenarios for which no consensus was reached.

Indexed as

anterior glenohumeral instabilitypediatric sports medicineshouldershoulder instability

Identifiers

PMID39380970
PMCPMC11459658

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.