Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39381264›Full record

ReviewMaterials today. Bio2024

Nanocatalytic medicine enabled next-generation therapeutics for bacterial infections.

Min Ge, Feng Jiang, Han Lin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials today. Bio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Min GeDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China.
Feng JiangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Han LinShanghai Institute of Ceramics Chinese Academy of Sciences, Research Unit of Nanocatalytic Medicine in Specific Therapy for Serious Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, 200050, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid rise of antibiotic-resistant strains and the persistence of biofilm-associated infections have significantly challenged global public health. Unfortunately, current clinical high-dose antibiotic regimens and combination therapies often fail to completely eradicate these infections, which can lead to adverse side effects and further drug resistance. Amidst this challenge, however, the burgeoning development in nanotechnology and nanomaterials brings hopes. This review provides a comprehensive summary of recent advancements in nanomaterials for treating bacterial infections. Firstly, the research progress of catalytic therapies in the field of antimicrobials is comprehensively discussed. Thereafter, we systematically discuss the strategies of nanomaterials for anti-bacterial infection therapies, including endogenous response catalytic therapy, exogenous stimulation catalytic therapy, and catalytic immunotherapy, in order to elucidate the mechanism of nanocatalytic anti-infections. Based on the current state of the art, we conclude with insights on the remaining challenges and future prospects in this rapidly emerging field.

Indexed as

AntibacterialBiomedicineNano-catalysisReactive oxygen species

Identifiers

PMID39381264
PMCPMC11459013

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.