Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39384321›Full record

SynthesisBMJ mental health2024

Systematic review of interventions for mental health, cognition and psychological well-being in long COVID.

Lisa D Hawke, Anh T P Nguyen, Wei Wang, Eric E Brown, Dandan Xu, Susan Deuville, Suzie Goulding, Chantal F Ski, Susan L Rossell, David R Thompson and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lisa D HawkeCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada lisa.hawke@camh.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1108-9453
Anh T P NguyenCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Wei WangCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Eric E BrownCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dandan XuHarbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Susan DeuvilleCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Suzie GouldingCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Chantal F SkiQueen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Susan L RossellSwinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
David R ThompsonQueen's University Belfast School of Nursing and Midwifery, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8518-6307
Terri RodakCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gillian StrudwickCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David CastleUniversity of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis systematic review aims to identify and synthesise the publicly available research testing treatments for mental health, cognition and psychological well-being in long COVID.

methodsThe following databases and repositories were searched in October-November 2023: Medline, Embase, APA PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, China National Knowledge Internet, WANFANG Data, Web of Science's Preprint Citation Index, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Clinicaltrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Articles were selected if they described participants with long COVID symptoms at least 4 weeks after SAR-CoV-19 infection, reported primary outcomes on mental health, cognition and/or psychological well-being, and were available with at least an English-language summary. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for systematic reviews were followed.

resultsThirty-three documents representing 31 studies were included. Seven tested psychosocial interventions, five pharmaceutical interventions, three natural supplement interventions, nine neurocognitive interventions, two physical rehabilitation interventions and five integrated interventions. While some promising findings emerged from randomised controlled trials, many studies were uncontrolled; a high risk of bias and insufficient reporting were also frequent.

conclusionsThe published literature on treatments for mental health, cognition and psychological well-being in long COVID show that the interventions are highly heterogeneous and findings are inconclusive to date. Continued scientific effort is required to improve the evidence base. Regular literature syntheses will be required to update and educate clinicians, scientists, interventionists and the long COVID community.

Indexed as

CognitionCOVID-19Mental HealthHumansPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromePsychological Well-BeingPsychosocial InterventionSARS-CoV-2COVID-19

Identifiers

PMID39384321
PMCPMC11474695

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.