Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39384655›Full record

SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2024

The effect of laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass on gastroesophageal reflux disease: An updated meta-analysis and systematic review of 5-year post-operative data from randomized controlled trials.

Muhammed Ashraf Memon, Emma Osland, Rossita Mohamad Yunus, Zahirul Hoque, Khorshed Alam, Shahjahan Khan

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Surgical Strategies for the Management of Obesity.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammed Ashraf MemonSchool of Mathematics, Physics and Computing and Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia. mmemon@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2589-2338
Emma OslandDepartment of Dietetics and Food Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Rossita Mohamad YunusInstitute of Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Zahirul HoqueSchool of Mathematics, Physics and Computing, University of Sourthern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia.
Khorshed AlamSchool of Business & Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia.
Shahjahan KhanSchool of Mathematics, Physics and Computing and Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate 5-year effect of laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (LVSG) versus laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) solely based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of 5-year postoperative GERD data comparing LVSG and LRYGB in adults were undertaken. Electronic databases were searched from January 2015 to March 2024 for publications meeting inclusion criteria. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman random effects model was applied to estimate pooled odds ratio where meta-analysis was possible. Bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2 and GRADE.

resultsFive RCTs were analysed (LVSG n = 554, LRYGB n = 539). LVSG was associated with increased adverse GERD outcomes compared to LRYGB at 5 years. The odds for revisional surgery to treat GERD in LVSG patients were 11 times higher compared to LRYGB (OR 11.47, 95% CI 1.83 to 71.69; p = 0.02; I

conclusionsThe development and worsening of GERD symptoms are frequently associated with LVSG compared to LRYGB at 5 years postoperatively requiring either initiation or increase of pharmacotherapy or failing that revisional bariatric surgery. Appropriate patient/surgical selection is crucial to reduce these postoperative risks of GERD.

Indexed as

GastrectomyGastric BypassGastroesophageal RefluxLaparoscopyPostoperative ComplicationsHumansObesity, MorbidRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReoperationTreatment OutcomeBariatric surgeryGastroesophageal reflux diseaseLaparoscopicMeta-analysisRoux-en-Y gastric bypassSleeve gastrectomySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39384655
PMCPMC11525329

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.