ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024
Efficacy study of platelet-rich plasma combined with core decompression and bone grafting in the treatment of early-stage avascular necrosis of the femoral head: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative efficacy and safety of core decompression, cell-based therapy, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, extracorporeal shock wave therapy, and combined regimens for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- A retrospective comparison of hyperbaric oxygen and core decompression for mild to moderate avascular necrosis of the femoral head.Medical gas research · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes and feasibility of 3D-printed titanium alloy scaffolds combined with platelet-rich plasma injection in the treatment of long-segment femoral defects.BMC research notes · 2026Article
- Biomechanical comparative analysis of multiple small diameter fan-shaped and parallel core decompression for early osteonecrosis of the femoral head.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of combined core decompression (CD), bone grafting (BG), and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in treating early-stage avascular necrosis of the femoral head (ANFH).
methodsA retrospective study was conducted on 74 patients (85 hips) with Ficat-Arlet stage I-II ANFH who were treated at our hospital between May 2015 and May 2018. The control group (20 patients, 22 hips) received symptomatic treatments, including weight-bearing reduction and oral analgesics. The CD + BG group (29 patients, 34 hips) underwent CD and β-tricalcium phosphate bone grafting. The PRP combination group (25 patients, 29 hips) received PRP injections in addition to CD and BG. Patients were followed up for five years to assess the necessity for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Data analysis was performed on those from the CD + BG and PRP groups who did not require THA. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Harris Hip Score (HHS), and the proportion of patients not accepting THA.
resultsAt the five-year follow-up, the rate of THA in the control group was 68.18% (15/22), while in the CD + BG group and the PRP combination group, the rates were 17.65% (6/34) and 10.34% (3/29), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the CD + BG group and the PRP combination group (P = 0.441), but both differed significantly from the control group (P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that over time, the proportion of patients in the PRP combination group who did not require THA was consistently higher than that in the CD + BG group. Among patients who did not undergo THA, the proportion of Ficat-Arlet stage I-II patients in the PRP combination group was 88.46% (23/26), which was higher than the 64.29% (18/28) in the CD + BG group, showing a significant difference (P = 0.038). VAS score and HHS were compared between the two groups at 6 months, 12 months, and the last follow-up point, with patients in the PRP combination group showing better scores than those in the CD + BG group (p < 0.05) in both metrics.
conclusionThe combination therapy of CD, BG, and PRP demonstrates significant advantages in improving symptoms and delaying disease progression in early-stage ANFH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.