Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39385250›Full record

ReviewImplementation science communications2024

Barriers and enablers to addressing smoking, nutrition, alcohol consumption, physical activity and gestational weight gain (SNAP-W) as part of antenatal care: A mixed methods systematic review.

Sophie Dilworth, Emma Doherty, Carly Mallise, Milly Licata, Jenna Hollis, Olivia Wynne, Cassandra Lane, Luke Wolfenden, John Wiggers, Melanie Kingsland

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Implementation science communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sophie DilworthPopulation Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia. Sophie.Dilworth@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3023-8074
Emma DohertyPopulation Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Carly MallisePopulation Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Milly LicataPopulation Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Jenna HollisPopulation Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Olivia WynnePopulation Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Cassandra LanePopulation Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Luke WolfendenPopulation Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
John WiggersPopulation Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Melanie KingslandPopulation Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council Grant ID: GNT9100003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternational clinical guidelines recommend that smoking, nutrition, alcohol consumption, physical activity and gestational weight gain (SNAP-W) be addressed as part of routine antenatal care throughout pregnancy. However, guideline recommendations are poorly implemented, and few antenatal care recipients routinely receive the recommended care. There is a need to establish the determinants (barriers and enablers) to care delivery to inform strategies to improve implementation. This systematic review aimed to synthesize qualitative and quantitative evidence of the barriers and enablers to the routine delivery of antenatal care targeting SNAP-W health risks.

methodsA systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Seven databases were searched for relevant studies published between January 2001 and November 2023. Study findings were coded and analysed according to the domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF).

resultsForty-nine studies were included in the review, 27 qualitative studies and 22 quantitative studies. The studies were conducted in 14 countries. Data were collected from 7146 antenatal care providers (midwives, Aboriginal health workers, obstetricians, medical officers, general practitioners) and 352 barriers and enablers were identified. Across all SNAP-W health risk and antenatal care provider groups, the predominant TDF domain was 'environmental context and resources', identified in 96% of studies. Barriers within this domain included insufficient time, limited access to and quality of resources, and limited organisational supports. 'Beliefs about consequences' was the second most common TDF domain, reported in 67% of studies, particularly studies of care related to alcohol use, nutrition/ physical activity/ gestational weight gain and those involving midwives, multidisciplinary practitioners and general practitioners. 'Optimism' was the second most common TDF domain for studies of smoking-related care and involving obstetricians, gynaecologists, and other mixed medical professions.

conclusionsIt is critical that determinants related to environmental context and resources including time, resources and organisational supports are considered in the development of strategies to support the implementation of recommended antenatal care related to SNAP-W risks. Strategies addressing clinician beliefs about consequences and optimism may also be needed to support the implementation of care related to specific health behaviours and by specific antenatal care provider groups. REGISTRATION: The review protocol was prospectively registered with Prospero: CRD42022353084; 22 October 2022.

Indexed as

AlcoholBarriersNutritionPhysical activityPregnancyPreventiveSmokingSystematic reviewTheoretical domains frameworkWeight

Identifiers

PMID39385250
PMCPMC11462853

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.