ArticleEpigenetics & chromatin2024
Methylation patterns at the adjacent CpG sites within enhancers are a part of cell identity.
Article in Epigenetics & chromatin, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA methylation biomarkers-based pan-cancer classifier: predictive modeling for cancer classification.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- Haplotype-resolved DNA methylation at theNPJ dementia · 2026Article
- Skeletal muscle methylome-transcriptome disruptions during the onset and progression of colorectal cancer-induced cachexia.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2026Article
- Epigenetic Impact of Sleep Timing in Children: Novel DNA Methylation Signatures via SWAG Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Epigenetic Drivers of Atrial Fibrillation: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Targets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Evaluation of Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Sequencing for the Study of DNA Methylation in Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIt is generally accepted that methylation status of CpG sites spaced up to 50 bp apart is correlated, and accumulation of locally disordered methylation at adjacent CpG sites is involved in neoplastic transformation, acting in similar way as stochastic accumulation of mutations.
resultsWe used EPIC microarray data from 596 samples, representing 12 healthy tissue and cell types, as well as 572 blood cancer specimens to analyze methylation status of adjacent CpG sites across human genome, and subsequently validated our findings with NGS and Sanger sequencing. Our analysis showed that there is a subset of the adjacent CpG sites in human genome, with cytosine at one CpG site methylated and the other devoid of methyl group. These loci map to enhancers that are targeted by families of transcription factors involved in cell differentiation. Moreover, our results suggest that the methylation at these loci differ between alleles within a cell, what allows for remarkable level of heterogeneity of methylation patterns. However, different types of specialized cells acquire only one specific and stable pattern of methylation at each of these loci and that pattern is to a large extent lost during neoplastic transformation.
conclusionsWe identified a substantial number of adjacent CpG loci in human genome that display remarkably stable and cell type specific methylation pattern. The methylation pattern at these loci appears to reflect different methylation of alleles in cells. Furthermore, we showed that changes of methylation status at those loci are likely to be involved in regulation of the activity of enhancers and contribute to neoplastic transformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.