ArticleJournal of clinical & translational endocrinology2024
Association between incretin-based drugs and risk of cholangiocarcinoma among patients with type 2 diabetes: A large population-based matched cohort study.
Article in Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Do Incretin-Based Therapies Influence the Risk of Cholangiocarcinoma in Type 2 Diabetes Patients? Insights from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and cancer risk: the good, the bad and the unknown.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- The Gastrointestinal Safety of Orforglipron, a GLP-1 Receptor Agonist, in Adults With or Without Type 2 Diabetes: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2026Review
- Glucagon-like peptide-1 medicines and cancer.Nature cancer · 2026Review
- Anti-diabetic medications and cancer: links beyond glycemic and body weight control.Precision clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and gastrointestinal cancer risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes.Diabetologia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To examine the association between the use of incretin-based drugs [glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4Is)] and the risk of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) in the United States. Methods: This large population-based, retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX datasets included adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who were new users of GLP-1RAs, DPP-4Is, or other second- or third-line antidiabetic drugs between 2010 and 2021. The primary outcome was the incidence of CCA. Results: A total of 3,816,071 patients were included (mean age, 61.4 years, female, 49.3 %). A 51 % and 23 % risk reduction in CCA after 1 year of exposure to GLP-1RAs (hazard ratio 0.49; 95 % CI 0.40-0.60) and DPP4Is (0.77, 95 % CI 0.67-0.90), respectively compared to new second-or third-line users. Results were consistent at 3, 5, and 7 years of follow-up (0.66, 0.71, and 0.72 for GLP-1RAs and 0.84, 0.87, and 0.85 for DPP-4Is, respectively). Compared to new metformin users, GLP-1RA users were associated with a 42 % lower risk of developing CCA, whereas DPP-4I group was not associated with an increased risk. Conclusions: GLP-1RAs and DPP-4Is were not associated with a significantly increased risk of CCA. GLP-1RAs even showed a reduced risk of CCA development. They can be considered as safe and effective treatment options for patients with T2DM at risk of CCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.