ArticleHeliyon2024
Identification of genome-wide copy number variation-driven subtypes for the treatment and prognostic prediction of esophageal carcinoma.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Esophageal carcinoma (ESCA) is a frequently detected gastrointestinal cancer. Copy number variants (CNVs) have a dramatic impact on the screening, diagnosis and prognostic prediction of cancers. However, the mechanism of action of CNVs on ESCA occurrence and progression remains unclear. Methods: ESCA samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were typed by consensus clustering using CNV-associated genes. Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) was used to section gene modules closely related to the two clusters, and sub-networks were constructed as hub genes. In addition, seven prognosis-correlated genes were further screened and retained by multivariate Cox regression analysis to develop a prognostic assessment model. The ssGSEA algorithm assessed energy metabolism levels in patients from different clusters and risk groups. Finally, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and live-dead cell staining verified the expression of genes associated with CNV risk scores. Results: ESCA was classified into two subtypes based on CNV values. Compared with cluster 1, cluster 2 had significantly higher level of immune score and tumor-associated immune cell infiltration as well as a noticeably better overall survival. The three modules most associated with the two clusters were identified by WGCNA, and a prognostic model with a strong prediction performance was constructed with their genes. Glycolysis, lactate metabolism, fatty acid synthesis, glutathione, methionine, and tryptophan metabolic pathway enrichment scores were remarkably higher in patients in cluster 1 and the high-risk group than in cluster 2 and the low-risk group. Knockdown PIK3C2A promoted ESCA cells apoptosis and inhibited cell vibiality. Conclusion: The current research maybe provides new understanding for the pathogenesis of ESCA based on CNV, providing an effective guidance for its clinical diagnosis and prognostic evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.