ArticleHeliyon2024
Identification of a novel prognostic model for gastric cancer utilizing glutamine-related genes.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- New Functions of Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Gastric Cancer: From Molecular Processes to Potential Treatments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- Identification and validation of calcium signaling pathway-related biomarkers in T1 and T2 lymph node metastatic gastric cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Glutamine metabolism presents a promising avenue for cancer prevention and treatment, but the underlying mechanisms in gastric cancer (GC) progression remain elusive. Methods: The TCGA-STAD and GEO GSE62254 datasets, containing gene expression, clinical information, and survival outcomes of GC, were meticulously examined. Differential expression analysis and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) were employed to excavate a key module (MEturquoise), which was used to intersect with glutamine metabolism-related genes (GMRGs) and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) to identify differentially expressed GMRGs (DE-GMRGs). LASSO and Cox Univariate analyses were implemented to determine risk model genes. Correlation of the risk model with clinical parameters, pathways, and tumor immune microenvironments, was analyzed, and its prognostic independence was validated by Cox analyses. Finally, reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed to validate the expression levels of MYB, LRFN4, LMNB2, and SLC1A5 in GC and para-carcinoma tissue. Results: The excavation of 4521 DEGs led to the discovery of the key MEturquoise module, which exhibited robust correlations with GC traits. The intersection analysis identified 42 DE-GMRGs, among which six genes showed consistency. Further LASSO analysis established Conclusion: The present study has generated a novel risk module containing four DE-GMRGs for predicting the prognosis and the response to immune checkpoint blockade treatments for GC. This risk model provides new insights into the involvement of glutamine metabolism in GC, warranting further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.