Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39387160›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2026

Analysis of selective neurocritical care admission costs following elective endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Steven G Roth, Seoiyoung Ahn, Campbell Liles, Lohit Velagapudi, Nishit Mummareddy, Yeji Ko, Austin M Hilvert, Michael T Froehler, Matthew R Fusco, Rohan V Chitale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Steven G RothCerebrovascular Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Seoiyoung AhnCerebrovascular Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1981-4584
Campbell LilesDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Lohit VelagapudiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Nishit MummareddyCerebrovascular Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Yeji KoDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Austin M HilvertVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0990-9929
Michael T FroehlerCerebrovascular Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1282-005X
Matthew R FuscoCerebrovascular Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Rohan V ChitaleCerebrovascular Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionNo consensus exists on the necessity of neurocritical care unit (NCU)-level care following unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA) treatment. We aim to identify patients requiring NCU-level care post-treatment and determine potential cost savings utilizing a selective NCU admission protocol.MethodsA retrospective analysis of all UIA patients who underwent endovascular treatment at a single center from 2017-2022 was conducted. Data on demographics, preprocedural variables, radiographic features, procedural techniques, intra/postoperative events, and length of stay (LOS) were collected. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify patients requiring NCU-level care post-treatment. Cost analysis using hospital cost data (not charges/reimbursement) was performed using simulated step-down and floor protocols for patients without NCU indications following a hypothetical six-hour post-anesthesia care unit observation period.ResultsOf 209 patients, 179 were discharged within 24 h and 30 had prolonged LOS. In our analysis, intra- and postoperative events independently predicted prolonged LOS. In our subanalysis, 47 patients demonstrated NCU needs: 24 with intraoperative indications, 18 with postoperative indications, and five with both. Of the 23 with postoperative indications, 20 were identified within six hours, while three were identified within six to 24 h. The median variable cost per patient for the current NCU protocol was $31,505 (IQR, $26,331-$37,053) vs. stepdown protocol $29,514 (IQR, $24,746-$35,011;p = 0.061) vs. floor protocol $26,768 (IQR, $22,214-$34,107;p < 0.001). Total variable costs were $6,211,497 for the current NCU protocol vs. $5,921,912 for the step-down protocol (4.89% savings) and $5,509,052 for the floor protocol (12.75% savings).ConclusionMost patients requiring NCU-level care following UIA treatment were identified within a six-hour postoperative window. Thus, selective NCU admission for this cohort following a six-hour observation period may be a logical avenue for cost reduction. Our analysis demonstrated 5% and 13% savings for uncomplicated patients using step-down and floor admission protocols, respectively.

Indexed as

Critical CareEndovascular ProceduresIntracranial AneurysmAgedElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAneurysmcost analysiselectiveendovascular

Identifiers

PMID39387160
PMCPMC11559827

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.