Trial reportThe Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine2025
A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Digital Intervention to Improve the Sexual Health of Adolescent and Young Adult Male Emergency Department Patients.
Trial report in The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inclusion of underserved young people in digital public health interventions for mental health, sexual health and substance use: A systematic review and intervention component analysis.Internet interventions · 2026Review
- Generative AI-Assisted Microlearning for Erectile Dysfunction Myth Reduction: Single-Center Pre-Post Quasi-Experimental Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Lock and Protect, Reducing Access to Adolescent Means of Suicide: A Pilot Feasibility Study.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Article
- Telehealth for Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare: Evidence Map of Effectiveness, Patient and Provider Experiences and Preferences, and Patient Engagement Strategies.Clinics and practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo assess implementation outcomes and potential efficacy of a user-informed, theory-based digital health intervention developed to improve adolescent and young adult (AYA) male sexual health.
methodsWe conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial of sexually active male emergency department (ED) patients aged 14-21 years. Participants were randomized to the intervention (Dr. Eric, Emergency Room Interventions to improve Care) or usual care. Dr. Eric consists of an ED-based sexual health app followed by 3 months of interactive text messages. We assessed the feasibility, adoption, and fidelity among users. Condom use, defined as the number of sexual encounters with condoms divided by the total number of sexual encounters over the past 4 weeks, was the primary efficacy outcome.
resultsWe enrolled 119 patients; mean age was 17.9 years, 87% were Hispanic, and half used condoms at last intercourse. Dr. Eric demonstrated feasibility, with high rates of consent (86.2%) and follow-up (81.5%). Intervention participants found Dr. Eric acceptable, liking (86.2%) and recommending (87.9%) the program. 98% of intervention participants interacted with all five app modules; one-quarter opted out of text messaging. At 6-week follow-up, the intervention group more often used a condom compared to the control group [OR 3.57, 95% confidence interval (1.93, 6.60)], p < .001]; however, this significant difference did not sustain at 13 weeks. DISCUSSION: Dr. Eric was feasible to deliver and acceptable to male AYA patients. To our knowledge, Dr. Eric is the first intervention to demonstrate evidence of short-term efficacy for improving condom use among male AYA in the ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.