Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39388906›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medicinal chemistry2024

Hiding in plain sight: Optimizing topoisomerase IIα inhibitors into Hsp90β selective binders.

Jaka Dernovšek, Tjaša Goričan, Marius Gedgaudas, Živa Zajec, Dunja Urbančič, Ana Jug, Žiga Skok, Caterina Sturtzel, Martin Distel, Simona Golič Grdadolnik and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medicinal chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The possibilities and challenges associated with selective targetingTransactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. Royal Society of South Africa · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jaka DernovšekFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva cesta 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Tjaša GoričanLaboratory for Molecular Structural Dynamics, Theory Department, National Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, 1001, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Marius GedgaudasDepartment of Biothermodynamics and Drug Design, Institute of Biotechnology, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio al. 7 (C319), LT-10257, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Živa ZajecFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva cesta 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Dunja UrbančičFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva cesta 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ana JugFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva cesta 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Žiga SkokFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva cesta 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Caterina SturtzelSt. Anna Children's Cancer Research Institute, Zimmermannplatz 10, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Martin DistelSt. Anna Children's Cancer Research Institute, Zimmermannplatz 10, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Simona Golič GrdadolnikLaboratory for Molecular Structural Dynamics, Theory Department, National Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, 1001, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Kesavan BabuDepartment of Chemical Biology and Therapeutics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105-3678, USA.
Ashna PanchamatiaDepartment of Chemical Biology and Therapeutics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105-3678, USA.
Timothy R StachowskiDepartment of Chemical Biology and Therapeutics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105-3678, USA.
Marcus FischerDepartment of Chemical Biology and Therapeutics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105-3678, USA.
Janez IlašFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva cesta 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Asta ZubrienėDepartment of Biothermodynamics and Drug Design, Institute of Biotechnology, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio al. 7 (C319), LT-10257, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Daumantas MatulisDepartment of Biothermodynamics and Drug Design, Institute of Biotechnology, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio al. 7 (C319), LT-10257, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Nace ZidarFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva cesta 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. Electronic address: nace.zidar@ffa.uni-lj.si.
Tihomir TomašičFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva cesta 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. Electronic address: tihomir.tomasic@ffa.uni-lj.si.

Funding

Exploiting Water Network Perturbations in Protein Binding SitesR35GM142772 · NIGMS · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI FISCHER, MARCUS · 2021 to 2025
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM142772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to their impact on several oncogenic client proteins, the Hsp90 family of chaperones has been widely studied for the development of potential anticancer agents. Although several Hsp90 inhibitors have entered clinical trials, most were unsuccessful because they induced a heat shock response (HSR). This issue can be circumvented by using isoform-selective inhibitors, but the high similarity in the ATP-binding sites between the isoforms presents a challenge. Given that Hsp90 shares a conserved Bergerat fold with bacterial DNA gyrase B and human topoisomerase IIα, we repurposed our ATP-competitive inhibitors of these two proteins for Hsp90 inhibition. We virtually screened a library of in-house inhibitors and identified eleven hits for evaluation of Hsp90 binding. Among these, compound 11 displayed low micromolar affinity for Hsp90 and demonstrated a 12-fold selectivity for Hsp90β over its closest isoform, Hsp90α. Out of 29 prepared analogs, 16 showed a preference for Hsp90β over Hsp90α. Furthermore, eleven of these compounds inhibited the growth of several cancer cell lines in vitro. Notably, compound 24e reduced intracellular levels of Hsp90 client proteins in MCF-7 cells, leading to cell cycle arrest in the G0/G1 phase without inducing HSR. This inhibitor exhibited at least a 27-fold preference for Hsp90β and was selective against topoisomerase IIα, a panel of 22 representative protein kinases, and proved to be non-toxic in a zebrafish larvae toxicology model. Finally, molecular modeling, corroborated by STD NMR studies, and the binding of 24e to the S52A mutant of Hsp90α confirmed that the serine to alanine switch drives the selectivity between the two cytoplasmic isoforms.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsTopoisomerase II InhibitorsZebrafishAnimalsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorHumansMolecular StructureStructure-Activity RelationshipAntineoplastic AgentsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsTopoisomerase II InhibitorsCancerHsp90Isoform selectivityTopoisomerase II

Identifiers

PMID39388906
PMCPMC12087459

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.