Evidence mapPaperPMID 39389786Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2024

Gestational Diabetes: An Update 60 Years After O'Sullivan and Mahan.

Harold David McIntyre, Ulla Kampmann, Tine Dalsgaard Clausen, Josephine Laurie, Ronald Ching Wan Ma

Abstract readReviewHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Diabetes and women's health.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Harold David McIntyreMater Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8819-5794
Ulla KampmannSteno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2234-7780
Tine Dalsgaard ClausenDepartment of Gynecology, Fertility and Obstetrics, Center for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5585-2153
Josephine LaurieMater Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4797-8519
Ronald Ching Wan MaDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-1227-803X

Funding

Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong SAR, China 14118718The Novo Nordisk Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sixty years after the landmark publication by O'Sullivan and Mahan, the current paper seeks to review and place into context the importance of gestational diabetes (GDM) both as a marker of increased risk of adverse maternal and fetal pregnancy outcomes and as an indicator of future maternal and infant health risks. We review the evolution of GDM as a diagnosis, the ongoing debate regarding diagnostic approaches, the underlying pathophysiology, and the epidemiology and the importance of GDM in the context of the global epidemics of diabetes and obesity. Focusing on clinical management, we review lifestyle-based therapy and pharmacotherapy for GDM, consider obstetric management, and outline the short-term and lifelong health risks posed by a GDM diagnosis.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalFemaleHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansPregnancyPregnancy Outcomediagnosisepidemiologygestational diabeteshyperglycemiapregnancytreatment

Identifiers

PMID39389786
PMCPMC11651698

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.