ArticleScientific reports2024
EEG synchronization patterns during a Go/No-Go task in individuals with aphasia in subacute and chronic phases of stroke.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A novel phase-difference transcranial alternating current stimulation system enables precise dual-site neuromodulation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stroke and subsequent neuroregenerative processes cause changes in neural organization of attentional functions. In this study, we attempted to identify differences in neural synchronization patterns during a visual Go/No-Go task in people with post-stroke aphasia in both subacute and chronic stroke phases. To identify neuronal underpinnings of the behavioral differences we investigated pairwise connectivity patterns using corrected imaginary phase locking value and graph-theoretic measures (efficiency, modularity and clustering coefficient) at global and local level in subacute (n = 13) and chronic stroke phases (n = 14) during a Go/No-Go task. We observed significantly lower phase synchronization in the Subacute Group in the alpha band in the connections spanning frontal and central areas of both hemispheres alongside lower local efficiency and clustering coefficient in the left frontal region. Additionally, we observed higher modularity in the beta band in the unaffected right parietal region in the Subacute Group which may denote inhibition of motor and attention functions. Those mechanisms could serve to align cognitive abilities between the damaged and healthy hemispheres, harmonizing the activity of the neuronal networks of both hemispheres disrupted by the effects of the stroke. Our findings have potential implications for rehabilitation therapies, which should take into account the pattern of connectivity changes during different phases of reovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.