Trial reportEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2025
Agomelatine in pediatric patients with moderate to severe major depressive disorder: an open-label extension study.
Trial report in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) in young people is a common psychiatric disorder, but treatment options are limited. Agomelatine has demonstrated short-term efficacy and safety in pediatric patients. We report here the results of a 92-week open-label extension (OLE). The international, multicenter, double-blind, study randomized 400 patients (80 children, 320 adolescents) with moderate-to-severe MDD to one of four treatment groups: agomelatine 10 mg (n = 102), agomelatine 25 mg (n = 95), placebo (n = 103), and fluoxetine 10-20 mg (n = 100). After 12 weeks, patients who could benefit from treatment continuation were offered entry into an optional OLE during which they received agomelatine 10 or 25 mg for a further 92 weeks. A total of 339 patients (271 adolescents) entered the OLE. Treatment groups considered for the OLE analysis reflected those received in the double-blind and OLE periods: agomelatine (10 or 25 mg) in both (ago/ago, n = 170); placebo then agomelatine 10-25 mg (pcb/ago, n = 85); or fluoxetine then agomelatine 10-25 mg (fluox/ago, n = 84). Mean age (± SD) at entry into the double-blind phase (Week 0) was 13.6 ± 2.7 years and 61.9% were female. Mean changes in Children's Depression Rating Scale revised (CDRS-R) raw total score from Week 12 to last post-Week 12 value in the three groups were - 16.3 ± 12.2 (ago/ago), - 18.9 ± 16.1 (pcb/ago), and - 16.1 ± 15.5 (fluox/ago), reflecting the difference in efficacy between treatments during the double-blind period, and heterogeneity at W12 between the treatment groups. Adverse events considered related to treatment occurred in 14.5% of patients: 15.3% ago/ago, 16.5% pcb/ago, and 10.7% fluox/ago. Three patients (all adolescents) experienced treatment-related severe adverse events: two treated with ago/ago and one treated with pcb/ago. Among the adolescents, one treatment-related severe adverse event in a patient in the pcb/ago group led to study withdrawal. Agomelatine was associated with continuous improvement in depressive symptoms without unexpected safety signals. These findings support the safe use of agomelatine in a pediatric population with moderate-to-severe MDD for up to 104 weeks.Trial registration No: EUDRACT No. 2015-002181-23.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.