ReviewFrontiers in genetics2024
Cell type specification and diversity in subpallial organoids.
Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling Alzheimer's disease with brain organoids: mechanisms, applications, and future directions.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Bioengineering innovations for neural organoids with enhanced fidelity and function.Cell stem cell · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neural organoids have emerged as valuable tools for studying the developing brain, sparking enthusiasm and driving their adoption in disease modeling, drug screening, and investigating fetal neural development. The increasing popularity of neural organoids as models has led to a wide range of methodologies aimed at continuous improvement and refinement. Consequently, research groups often improve and reconfigure protocols to create region-specific organoids, resulting in diverse phenotypes, including variations in morphology, gene expression, and cell populations. While these improvements are exciting, routine adoptions of such modifications and protocols in the research laboratories are often challenging due to the reiterative empirical testing necessary to validate the cell types generated. To address this challenge, we systematically compare the similarities and differences that exist across published protocols that generates subpallial-specific organoids to date. In this review, we focus specifically on exploring the production of major GABAergic neuronal subtypes, especially Medium Spiny Neurons (MSNs) and Interneurons (INs), from multiple subpallial organoid protocols. Importantly, we look to evaluate the cell type diversity and the molecular pathways manipulated to generate them, thus broadening our understanding of the existing subpallial organoids as well as assessing the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.