Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39391586›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in aging neuroscience2024

Mechanisms underlying delirium in patients with critical illness.

Ying-Ying Fan, Ruo-Yu Luo, Meng-Tian Wang, Chao-Yun Yuan, Yuan-Yuan Sun, Ji-Yong Jing

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Animal models of delirium: a narrative review.Translational psychiatry · 2026
    Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ying-Ying FanSchool of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Ruo-Yu LuoSchool of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Meng-Tian WangZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Chao-Yun YuanZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Yuan-Yuan SunZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Ji-Yong JingZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delirium is an acute, global cognitive disorder syndrome, also known as acute brain syndrome, characterized by disturbance of attention and awareness and fluctuation of symptoms. Its incidence is high among critically ill patients. Once patients develop delirium, it increases the risk of unplanned extubation, prolongs hospital stay, increases the risk of nosocomial infection, post-intensive care syndrome-cognitive impairment, and even death. Therefore, it is of great importance to understand how delirium occurs and to reduce the incidence of delirium in critically ill patients. This paper reviews the potential pathophysiological mechanisms of delirium in critically ill patients, with the aim of better understanding its pathophysiological processes, guiding the formulation of effective prevention and treatment strategies, providing a basis for clinical medication.

Indexed as

cognition impairmentcritical illnessdeliriummechanismreview

Identifiers

PMID39391586
PMCPMC11464339

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.