Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39393404›Full record

ArticleEndocrine connections2024

Application of machine learning algorithm incorporating dietary intake in prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus.

Tianze Ding, Peijie Liu, Jie Jia, Hui Wu, Jie Zhu, Kefeng Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine connections, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tianze DingDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0009-0006-7425-2093
Peijie LiuDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jie JiaDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Hui WuDepartment of Nutrition, Seventh People's Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jie ZhuNutrition and Foods Program, School of Family and Consumer Sciences, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5304-7708
Kefeng YangDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6973-6150

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) significantly affects pregnancy outcomes. Therefore, it is crucial to develop prediction models since they can guide timely interventions to reduce the incidence of GDM and its associated adverse effects. Methods: A total of 554 pregnant women were selected and their sociodemographic characteristics, clinical data and dietary data were collected. Dietary data were investigated by a validated semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). We applied random forest mean decrease impurity for feature selection and the models are built using logistic regression, XGBoost, and LightGBM algorithms. The prediction performance of different models was compared by accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under curve (AUC) and Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Results: Blood glucose, age, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) were the top five features according to the feature selection. Among the three algorithms, XGBoost performed best with an AUC of 0.788, LightGBM came second (AUC = 0.749), and logistic regression performed the worst (AUC = 0.712). In addition, XGBoost and LightGBM both achieved a fairly good performance when dietary information was included, surpassing their performance on the non-dietary dataset (0.788 vs 0.718 in XGBoost; 0.749 vs 0.726 in LightGBM). Conclusion: XGBoost and LightGBM algorithms outperform logistic regression in predicting GDM among Chinese pregnant women. In addition, dietary data may have a positive effect on improving model performance, which deserves more in-depth investigation with larger sample size.

Indexed as

feature selectiongestational diabetes mellitusmachine learningprediction model

Identifiers

PMID39393404
PMCPMC11623027

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.