Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39393637›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics2025

Nourishing Farm to School Practice With Data to Inform Program Needs: An Evaluation of Participation Among California Public Districts During the 2018-2019 School Year.

Lynnea M LoPresto, Julie H T Dang, Melanie S Dove

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lynnea M LoPrestoDepartment of Nutrition, School of Health Sciences, University of the Pacific, Sacramento, California. Electronic address: llopresto@pacific.edu.
Julie H T DangDivision of Health Policy and Management, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California.
Melanie S DoveDivision of Health Policy and Management, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California.

Funding

Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI KC KENT LLOYD · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
UC Davis Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001860 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KENYON, NICHOLAS J., LYLES, COURTNEY REES · 2016 to 2025
$47.3M
Institutional Career Development Core (KL2)KL2TR001859 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HOLMES, JAMES F. · 2016 to 2025
$10.1M
University of California, Davis: Human Papillomavirus Cancer Free (UCD: HPV Cancer Free)K01CA258956 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Julie Dang · 2023 to 2026
$672k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001859NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001860NCI NIH HHS K01 CA258956NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe US Department of Agriculture promotes farm to school (F2S) as an evidence-based approach to help school meals meet updated nutrition standards that promote health. California is a key agricultural state with strong support for F2S to promote local agriculture and equitable access to nutritious food for all students.

objectiveExamine district characteristics associated with F2S participation among California public districts during the 2018-2019 school year.

designCross-sectional evaluation of 2019 US Department of Agriculture Farm to School Census data. PARTICIPANTS/

settingCalifornia public districts responding to the 2019 US Department of Agriculture F2S Census (N = 572).

main outcome measureReported participation in F2S activities in 2018-2019. Covariates included district size, annual per-pupil spending, urbanicity, racial/ethnic composition, and percent free and reduced-price meal (% FRPM) eligibility. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics (unweighted frequency and weighted percent) were reported for demographic characteristics. Weighted, multiple logistic regression assessed associations between demographic characteristics and F2S participation, reported as odds ratios (95% CI).

resultsNearly 78% of California respondents reported F2S participation. Top activities were serving local food in school lunch (73%) and breakfast (65%) and local food promotion at school (45.5%). The odds of participation among districts with enrollments ≥1000 were 1.79 (95% CI 1.15 to 2.79) times higher than smaller districts and 1.57 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.28) times higher in districts with lower annual per-pupil spending (≤$13 707). No significant differences were found by racial/ethnic composition, % FRPM eligibility, or urbanicity.

conclusionsDisparities in F2S participation exist for small districts and those with high annual per-pupil spending that may lack the advantages of economies of scale. Grant incentives and support networks for these groups are recommended along with increased monitoring focused on the quality of F2S engagement. Administration of a brief annual state F2S Census could support more timely monitoring and accountability to align with state goals and improve opportunities for data sharing and community engagement.

Indexed as

Food ServicesHealth PromotionSchoolsAdolescentCaliforniaChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFood AssistanceHumansMaleUnited StatesUnited States Department of AgricultureChild nutrition programFarm to schoolHealth disparitiesQuantitative methodology

Identifiers

PMID39393637
PMCPMC12320477

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.