SynthesisBMC pediatrics2024
Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms with caries risk in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Genetic Variants and Dental Caries Susceptibility: An Umbrella Review and Multilevel Meta-Analysis.Genes · 2026Pooled it
- Vitamin D Levels During Pregnancy and Dental Caries in Offspring.JAMA network open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate the association of vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphism with caries risk in children(< 18 years).
methodsThe electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, Cqvip, and Wanfang were searched for observational studies on the relationship between VDR single nucleotide polymorphism(SNP) and caries, including cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. Quality assessment of selected studies was conducted using the Newcastle Ottawa scale. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) values for associations of individual VDR SNP with dental caries were calculated based on four genetic models: allelic, recessive, dominant, and over-dominant.
resultsOf 79 studies considered, 10 (nine case-control and one cross-sectional) were selected for analysis; the studies involved seven VDR SNPs: ApaI(rs7975232),BsmI(rs1544410),FokI(rs2228570),TaqI(rs731236), TaqI/BglI(rs739837), FokI(rs10735810) and Cdx-2(rs11568820). Alleles C and T of FokI(rs10735810) were significantly differently distributed in the caries and caries-free groups (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.30-2.30, P = 0.03), with CC + CT genotypes at this locus associated with greater risk of developing caries than the TT genotype (OR = 1.87, 95%CI: 1.15-3.04, P = 0.01). Further, TT + CC genotype at TaqI(rs731236) was associated with a 1.33-fold higher risk of caries development than the TC genotype (OR = 1.33, 95%CI: 1.06-1.67, P = 0.02). On subgroup analysis, the association between TaqI(rs731236) and caries risk was affected by dentition type, and ethnicity (permanent dentition: OR = 1.48, 95%CI: 1.07-2.03, P = 0.02; Asian: OR = 1.38, 95%CI: 1.02-1.87, P = 0.03;). Genotype distributions at BsmI(rs1544410), TaqI/BglI(rs739837), FokI(rs2228570), and ApaI(rs7975232) did not differ significantly between the caries and caries-free groups.
conclusionsCaries risk could be associated with TaqI(rs731236) and FokI(rs10735810) genotypes, and TaqI(rs731236) may be a risk factor for permanent teeth caries among Asian people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.