ArticleScientific reports2024
Comparison of clinical, laboratory and radiological characteristics between COVID-19 and Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia (CPP) exhibits similar characteristics as of COVID-19 with respect to clustering outbreaks and onset symptoms. This study is aimed at exploring the different clinical manifestations of both pneumonias to establish a simple nomogram to distinguish them. This multicenter, retrospective, case-control study compared two independent cohorts of patients with CPP or COVID-19. The risk factors of CPP were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression, which was used to establish the nomogram. Both patients with CPP and COVID-19 exhibited similar clinical symptoms. As compared to patients with COVID-19, a higher proportion of patients with CPP had nervous system symptoms. Patients with CPP had higher inflammatory indicators, creatine kinase, and lower lymphocyte and albumin. They also had lower proportions of ground-glass opacity and bilateral lung involvement than COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, patients with CPP had higher 30 day mortality as well as higher rates of severe pneumonia, septic shock, and ICU admission. Multivariate logistic regression showed that nervous system symptoms, lymphocytes, creatine kinase, bilateral lung lesions, and ground-glass opacity were risk factors for CPP. Incorporating these five factors, the nomogram achieved good concordance index of 0.989 in differentiating CPP from COVID-19, and had well-fitted calibration curves. Despite similar clinical characteristics, nervous system symptoms, lymphocyte, creatine kinase, lesions in bilateral lungs, and ground-glass opacity may help in differentiating the pneumonias. These were combined into a clinically useful nomogram for rapid and early identification of CPP to avoid misdiagnosis and help in the decision-making process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.