ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2025
Clinical and subclinical acute brain injury caused by invasive cardiovascular procedures.
Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-Stroke Recrudescence During the Perioperative Period: Potential Roles of Anesthetic and Sedative Agents.Cureus · 2026Review
- Mitral valve surgery combined with on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus off-pump or on-pump beating heart CABG: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Silent brain infarcts after major cardiac interventions: a retrospective paired cohort study using high-resolution DW-MRI.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Silent Stroke in Adult Cardiac Surgery: Mechanisms, Clinical Impact, and Preventive Strategies.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Nanomaterial-enhanced biosensors for traumatic brain injury biomarker detection: a review of analytical performance, machine learning integration, clinical validation, and point-of-care translation.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Heart-brain axis pathophysiological understanding and clinical impact.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke after cardiac surgery or intervention: a retrospective cohort analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- 2024 Update on Cerebral Embolic Protection After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past 50 years, the number and invasiveness of percutaneous cardiovascular procedures globally have increased substantially. However, cardiovascular interventions are inherently associated with a risk of acute brain injury, both periprocedurally and postprocedurally, which impairs medical outcomes and increases health-care costs. Current international clinical guidelines generally do not cover the area of acute brain injury related to cardiovascular invasive procedures. In this international Consensus Statement, we compile the available knowledge (including data on prevalence, pathophysiology, risk factors, clinical presentation and management) to formulate consensus recommendations on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of acute brain injury caused by cardiovascular interventions. We also identify knowledge gaps and possible future directions in clinical research into acute brain injury related to cardiovascular interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39394524What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.