Evidence mapPaperPMID 39394785Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2025

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Underdiagnosis Patterns by Individual-level and Spatial Social Vulnerability Measures.

Emily L Silva, Kevin J Lane, Jay Jojo Cheng, Zachary Popp, Breanna D van Loenen, Brent Coull, Jaime E Hart, Tamarra James-Todd, Shruthi Mahalingaiah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emily L SilvaDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2251-6289
Kevin J LaneDepartment of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1038-6811
Jay Jojo ChengDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53726, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4868-1568
Zachary PoppDepartment of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Breanna D van LoenenDepartment of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Brent CoullDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1808-4156
Jaime E HartDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0826-1163
Tamarra James-ToddDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3589-5169
Shruthi MahalingaiahDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5527-5787

Funding

TOXICOLOGYP30ES000002 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI Douglas W Dockery · 1985 to 2023
$12.4M
Climate factors, racial/ethnic disparities, and menstrual cycle healthR01ES035106 · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · 2025 to 2025
$547k
NICHD's Fertility and Infertility BranchNIEHS Center Junior Investigator RSDP K12NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES000002NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES035106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo use electronic health records (EHR) data at Boston Medical Center (BMC) to identify individual-level and spatial predictors of missed diagnosis, among those who meet diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

methodsThe BMC Clinical Data Warehouse was used to source patients who presented between October 1, 2003, and September 30, 2015, for any of the following: androgen blood tests, hirsutism, evaluation of menstrual regularity, pelvic ultrasound for any reason, or PCOS. Algorithm PCOS cases were identified as those with International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for irregular menstruation and either an ICD code for hirsutism, elevated testosterone lab, or polycystic ovarian morphology as identified using natural language processing on pelvic ultrasounds. Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of missed PCOS diagnosis by age, race/ethnicity, education, primary language, body mass index, insurance type, and social vulnerability index (SVI) score.

resultsIn the 2003-2015 BMC-EHR PCOS at-risk cohort (n = 23 786), there were 1199 physician-diagnosed PCOS cases and 730 algorithm PCOS cases. In logistic regression models controlling for age, year, education, and SVI scores, Black/African American patients were more likely to have missed a PCOS diagnosis (OR = 1.69 [95% CI, 1.28, 2.24]) compared to non-Hispanic White patients, and relying on Medicaid or charity for insurance was associated with an increased odds of missed diagnosis when compared to private insurance (OR = 1.90 [95% CI, 1.47, 2.46], OR = 1.90 [95% CI, 1.41, 2.56], respectively). Higher SVI scores were associated with increased odds of missed diagnosis in univariate models.

conclusionWe observed individual-level and spatial disparities within the PCOS diagnosis. Further research should explore drivers of disparities for earlier intervention.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ErrorsPolycystic Ovary SyndromeVulnerable PopulationsAdolescentAdultAlgorithmsBostonElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansYoung Adultclinical diagnosisdisparitiesPCOSpolycystic ovary syndrome

Identifiers

PMID39394785
PMCPMC12086426

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.