Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39395197›Full record

Trial reportExperimental physiology2025

Nebulized fentanyl does not improve exercise capacity or dyspnoea in fibrosing interstitial lung disease.

Charlotte Chen, John Kolbe, Julian F R Paton, James P Fisher

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Experimental physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Charlotte ChenManaaki Manawa - The Centre for Heart Research, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4701-2212
John KolbeFaculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Julian F R PatonManaaki Manawa - The Centre for Heart Research, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7410-2913
James P FisherManaaki Manawa - The Centre for Heart Research, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7851-9222

Funding

Clinical Research Training Fellowship from the Health Research Council of New Zealand 20/002The Green Lane Research and Educational Fund Board 21/02/4154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exercise intolerance and exertional dyspnoea are hallmarks of fibrosing interstitial lung disease (FILD) and are associated with worse prognosis and quality of life. Activation of pulmonary vagal afferents influences the ventilatory pattern and contributes to the sensation of dyspnoea. We tested the hypothesis that nebulized fentanyl, which might attenuate aberrant pulmonary afferent activity in FILD, reduces ventilation and dyspnoea while extending exercise endurance time (EET). In this randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study, eight FILD patients (two males, 71 ± 6 years of age) performed incremental cardiopulmonary cycle exercise tests following nebulization of either fentanyl citrate (100 µg) or 0.9% saline. Previous work indicated that this dose was unlikely to produce central effects. Comparisons between treatment conditions at rest were undertaken using Student's paired t-test, and exercise data were evaluated with two-way ANOVA with repeated measures. Dyspnoea was assessed using the Borg dyspnoea scale. Resting respiratory variables were not different following treatment with fentanyl and saline; however, resting heart rate was lower following fentanyl (P = 0.002) and remained lower throughout exercise compared with placebo (P = 0.008). Fentanyl did not increase EET (placebo 334 ± 117 s vs. fentanyl 348 ± 126 s, P = 0.250) although overall minute ventilation was reduced slightly (mean difference: -0.97 L/min, P = 0.022). There were no differences in ratings of dyspnoea intensity or unpleasantness between the conditions either at rest or at end-exercise. Nebulized fentanyl did not improve EET or exercise dyspnoea but did decrease minute ventilation during exercise, although the extent of this reduction appears clinically insignificant. These findings suggest that nebulized fentanyl is unlikely to offer significant benefits for enhancing exercise capacity in FILD.

Indexed as

DyspneaExercise ToleranceFentanylLung Diseases, InterstitialNebulizers and VaporizersAdministration, InhalationAgedExerciseExercise TestFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedSingle-Blind MethodFentanylafferentsdyspnoeaexercise

Identifiers

PMID39395197
PMCPMC11689134

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.