Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39396091›Full record

Trial reportPediatric research2025

Remote ischemic post-conditioning for neonatal encephalopathy: a safety and feasibility trial.

Emily Lo, Mehmet N Cizmeci, Diane Wilson, Linh G Ly, Amr El-Shahed, Martin Offringa, Agostino Pierro, Brian T Kalish

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emily LoDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
Mehmet N CizmeciDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
Diane WilsonDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
Linh G LyDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
Amr El-ShahedDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
Martin OffringaChild Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, 686 Bay Street, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada.
Agostino PierroInstitute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Brian T KalishDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada. brian.kalish@sickkids.ca.

Funding

internal research funds provided by the Hospital for Sick Children
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite implementation of therapeutic hypothermia (TH) for infants with neonatal encephalopathy (NE), a significant proportion of infants suffer neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI). Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a proposed neuroprotective maneuver that has been studied in adults with brain injury, but it has not been previously investigated in infants with NE.

methodsWe performed a prospective, randomized, safety and dose escalation study in 32 neonates with NE. Four cohorts of consecutive patients were randomized to RIC therapy, including four cycles of limb ischemia and reperfusion on progressive days of TH, or sham. Clinical, biochemical, and safety outcomes were monitored in both groups.

resultsAll patients received the designated RIC therapy without interruption or delay. RIC was not associated with increased pain, vascular, cutaneous, muscular, or neural safety events. There was no difference in the incidence of seizures, brain injury, or mortality between the two groups with the escalation of RIC dose and frequency.

conclusionsWe found that RIC is a safe and feasible adjunctive therapy for neonates with NE undergoing TH. IMPACT: This pilot study establishes critical safety and feasibility data that are necessary for the design of future studies to investigate the potential efficacy of RIC to reduce NDI. IMPACT: Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a possible neuroprotective intervention in infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). RIC can be administered concurrently with therapeutic hypothermia without any notable adverse events. Future studies will need to address potential efficacy of RIC to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes, as well as consider the ideal temporal window and dose for RIC in this patient population.

Indexed as

Brain DiseasesHypothermia, InducedHypoxia-Ischemia, BrainIschemic PostconditioningFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePilot ProjectsProspective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.