ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2025
Measuring Fidelity to Individual Placement and Support for Transition Age Youth: Psychometric Findings.
Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individual Placement and Support (IPS), an evidence-based supported employment model for working-age adults with serious mental illness, also serves transition age adults (TAY; ages 16-24). The IPS-Y is a new IPS fidelity scale tailored to this younger population. Although adopted worldwide, it lacks research on the psychometric properties of its two components (employment and education). Six IPS programs serving TAY were assessed on IPS-Y (Employment) in an initial review (Time 1) and on both components in a second review one year later (Time 2). We examined scale calibration, reliability, and validity for the IPS-Y in this sample. Fidelity reviewers use the full range of ratings, from "not IPS" to "exemplary," on both IPS-Y components. On the employment component, item calibration was excellent; internal consistency reliability was good at Time 1 (r = .81) and test-retest reliability was fair (r = .63). The IPS-Y (Employment) showed excellent sensitivity to change, with the mean scale score increasing from 88.3 to 105.5. IPS-Y (Employment) item ratings at Time 2 were similar to corresponding items in a sample of conventional IPS programs using the standard IPS fidelity scale. Predictive validity was promising for both components, with fidelity scale ratings positively correlated with site-level competitive employment rates (r = .57) and education enrollment rates (r = .69). IPS can be implemented to good fidelity for programs serving TAY. Preliminary findings regarding the psychometric properties of the IPS-Y Employment are encouraging, but replication in larger samples is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39397116What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.