ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2025
Combining serum CDK1 with tumor markers for the diagnosis of small cell lung cancer.
Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Integrated bioinformatics analysis to explore potential therapeutic targets and drugs for small cell carcinoma of the esophagus.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAn investigation of the diagnostic and clinical value of cell cycle-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) in small cell lung cancer (SCLC).
methodsA large tertiary hospital in Jiangxi Province enrolled 80 SCLC cases, 105 cases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 114 cases of pulmonary nodule (PN) and 60 control cases from December 2022 to December 2023. ELISA was used to measure CDK1 levels in serum. The expression levers of neuron-specific enolase (NSE), Pro gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199) and cytokeratin 19 fragment (YFRA21-1) were detected by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay.
results①CDK1, ProGRP, NSE, and CA199 expressions were significantly higher in the SCLC group compared to the NSCLC, PN and Control groups (P < 0.01). ②Spearman correlation analysis showed that serum levels of CDK1, NSE, and ProGRP were associated with clinical staging and lymph node metastasis in SCLC patients (P < 0.05). ③The serum levels of CDK1, NSE, and ProGRP in patients with extensive-disease (ED) SCLC were higher than those in patients with limited-disease (LD) SCLC (P < 0.05), and the serum levels of CDK1, NSE, and ProGRP in SCLC patients with lymph node metastasis were higher than those without lymph node metastasis (P < 0.05). ④Compared with the NSCLC group, the AUC of subjects diagnosed with SCLC by CDK1 was the largest and the sensitivity was the highest, 0.831 and 72.50%, the specificity of ProGRP in diagnosing SCLC is the highest, at 95.20% (P < 0.01). Compared with the PN group, CDK1 had the highest AUC, sensitivity, and specificity in diagnosing SCLC, with values of 0.93%, 88.80%, and 94.70%, respectively (P < 0.01). ⑤The combination of CDK1, ProGRP and NSE had the highest AUC and sensitivity of 0.903 and 86.30% for the diagnosis of SCLC (P < 0.01).
conclusionCDK1 not only plays an important role in assisting the diagnosis of SCLC but also in the differential diagnosis between SCLC and NSCLC. The combination of CDK1 and NSE and ProGRP can significantly improve the diagnostic performance and provide new ideas for the clinical diagnosis of SCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39397200What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.