Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39397425›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2024

Current approaches and outstanding challenges of functional annotation of metabolites: a comprehensive review.

Quang-Huy Nguyen, Ha Nguyen, Edwin C Oh, Tin Nguyen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. PMconv: How to Compare Proteomes and Metabolomes?International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Quang-Huy NguyenDepartment of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, United States.
Ha NguyenDepartment of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, United States.
Edwin C OhDepartment of Internal Medicine, UNLV School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, United States.
Tin NguyenDepartment of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, United States.

Funding

Tracking and EvaluationU54GM104944 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS · PI MARCHAND, GWEN · 2013 to 2023
$39.6M
A web-based platform for robust single-cell analysis, bulk data deconvolution and system-level analysisR44GM152152 · NIGMS · ADVAITA CORPORATION · PI IOSEF, CRISTIANA · 2023 to 2024
$1.8M
Personalization of graphical models using multi-omics data for subtype discovery and prognosisU01CA274573 · NCI · AUBURN UNIVERSITY AT AUBURN · PI LUU, HUNG N, NGUYEN, TIN C · 2023 to 2025
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS 1U01CA274573-01A1NCI NIH HHS U01 CA274573NIGMS NIH HHS 5U54GM104944NIGMS NIH HHS R44 GM152152NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104944NSF 2343019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolite profiling is a powerful approach for the clinical diagnosis of complex diseases, ranging from cardiometabolic diseases, cancer, and cognitive disorders to respiratory pathologies and conditions that involve dysregulated metabolism. Because of the importance of systems-level interpretation, many methods have been developed to identify biologically significant pathways using metabolomics data. In this review, we first describe a complete metabolomics workflow (sample preparation, data acquisition, pre-processing, downstream analysis, etc.). We then comprehensively review 24 approaches capable of performing functional analysis, including those that combine metabolomics data with other types of data to investigate the disease-relevant changes at multiple omics layers. We discuss their availability, implementation, capability for pre-processing and quality control, supported omics types, embedded databases, pathway analysis methodologies, and integration techniques. We also provide a rating and evaluation of each software, focusing on their key technique, software accessibility, documentation, and user-friendliness. Following our guideline, life scientists can easily choose a suitable method depending on method rating, available data, input format, and method category. More importantly, we highlight outstanding challenges and potential solutions that need to be addressed by future research. To further assist users in executing the reviewed methods, we provide wrappers of the software packages at https://github.com/tinnlab/metabolite-pathway-review-docker.

Indexed as

MetabolomicsSoftwareComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualHumansMetabolomefunctional analysisliquid chromatographymass spectrometrymetabolic pathwaysmetabolomics

Identifiers

PMID39397425
PMCPMC11471905

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.