Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39397426›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024

Pioneering bioinformatics with agent-based modelling: an innovative protocol to accurately forecast skin or respiratory allergic reactions to chemical sensitizers.

Giulia Russo, Elena Crispino, Silvia Casati, Emanuela Corsini, Andrew Worth, Francesco Pappalardo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Giulia RussoDepartment of Drug and Health Sciences, University of Catania, V.le A. Doria, 6, 95125 Catania (IT), Italy.
Elena CrispinoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia, 63, 95125 Catania (IT), Italy.
Silvia CasatiEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via Enrico Fermi, 2749 - TP 123 21027 - Ispra (VA), Italy.
Emanuela CorsiniDepartment of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, Università degli studi di Milano, Via Balzaretti 9, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Andrew WorthEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via Enrico Fermi, 2749 - TP 123 21027 - Ispra (VA), Italy.
Francesco PappalardoDepartment of Drug and Health Sciences, University of Catania, V.le A. Doria, 6, 95125 Catania (IT), Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1668-3320

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assessment of the allergenic potential of chemicals, crucial for ensuring public health safety, faces challenges in accuracy and raises ethical concerns due to reliance on animal testing. This paper presents a novel bioinformatic protocol designed to address the critical challenge of predicting immune responses to chemical sensitizers without the use of animal testing. The core innovation lies in the integration of advanced bioinformatics tools, including the Universal Immune System Simulator (UISS), which models detailed immune system dynamics. By leveraging data from structural predictions and docking simulations, our approach provides a more accurate and ethical method for chemical safety evaluations, especially in distinguishing between skin and respiratory sensitizers. Our approach integrates a comprehensive eight-step process, beginning with the meticulous collection of chemical and protein data from databases like PubChem and the Protein Data Bank. Following data acquisition, structural predictions are performed using cutting-edge tools such as AlphaFold to model proteins whose structures have not been previously elucidated. This structural information is then utilized in subsequent docking simulations, leveraging both ligand-protein and protein-protein interactions to predict how chemical compounds may trigger immune responses. The core novelty of our method lies in the application of UISS-an advanced agent-based modelling system that simulates detailed immune system dynamics. By inputting the results from earlier stages, including docking scores and potential epitope identifications, UISS meticulously forecasts the type and severity of immune responses, distinguishing between Th1-mediated skin and Th2-mediated respiratory allergic reactions. This ability to predict distinct immune pathways is a crucial advance over current methods, which often cannot differentiate between the sensitization mechanisms. To validate the accuracy and robustness of our approach, we applied the protocol to well-known sensitizers: 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene for skin allergies and trimellitic anhydride for respiratory allergies. The results clearly demonstrate the protocol's ability to differentiate between these distinct immune responses, underscoring its potential for replacing traditional animal-based testing methods. The results not only support the potential of our method to replace animal testing in chemical safety assessments but also highlight its role in enhancing the understanding of chemical-induced immune reactions. Through this innovative integration of computational biology and immunological modelling, our protocol offers a transformative approach to toxicological evaluations, increasing the reliability of safety assessments.

Indexed as

AllergensComputational BiologyAnimalsHumansHypersensitivityMolecular Docking SimulationRespiratory HypersensitivitySkinAllergensagent-based modelsallergic asthmabioinformaticsnonanimal methodspredictive modellingregulatory toxicologyrespiratory allergensskin allergens

Identifiers

PMID39397426
PMCPMC11471897

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.