ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Bioinformatics approaches for studying molecular sex differences in complex diseases.
Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in sex-specific single-cell transcriptomic profiling in Parkinson's disease.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Review
- LimROTS: a hybrid method integrating empirical Bayes and reproducibility-optimized statistics for robust differential expression analysis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many complex diseases exhibit pronounced sex differences that can affect both the initial risk of developing the disease, as well as clinical disease symptoms, molecular manifestations, disease progression, and the risk of developing comorbidities. Despite this, computational studies of molecular data for complex diseases often treat sex as a confounding variable, aiming to filter out sex-specific effects rather than attempting to interpret them. A more systematic, in-depth exploration of sex-specific disease mechanisms could significantly improve our understanding of pathological and protective processes with sex-dependent profiles. This survey discusses dedicated bioinformatics approaches for the study of molecular sex differences in complex diseases. It highlights that, beyond classical statistical methods, approaches are needed that integrate prior knowledge of relevant hormone signaling interactions, gene regulatory networks, and sex linkage of genes to provide a mechanistic interpretation of sex-dependent alterations in disease. The review examines and compares the advantages, pitfalls and limitations of various conventional statistical and systems-level mechanistic analyses for this purpose, including tailored pathway and network analysis techniques. Overall, this survey highlights the potential of specialized bioinformatics techniques to systematically investigate molecular sex differences in complex diseases, to inform biomarker signature modeling, and to guide more personalized treatment approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.