ArticleHeliyon2024
Development of a predictive model for the U-shaped relationship between the triglyceride glycemic index and depression using machine learning (NHANES 2009-2018).
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between triglyceride-glucose index and myocardial injury in patients with heat stroke: an observational, retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Association between triglyceride-glucose index and its combination with obesity indicators and depression: findings from NHANES 2005-2020.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- The association between triglyceride-glucose index and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and all-cause mortality in the general US population: NHANES 2001-2018.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: At present, the relationship between depression and the triglyceride glycemic (TyG) index remains a topic of debate. This study sought to elucidate the relationship between depression and the TyG index to create a predictive model that would help doctors diagnose patients. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study utilizing the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) dataset, which comprises data from 2009 to 2018. The analysis involved 11,222 adults with a Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score of 5 or higher, indicating the presence of depression. As part of the analysis, multiple regression models were used to test whether a linear relationship existed between the TyG index and depression. A threshold effects analysis was used to generate smoothed curves and detect nonlinear correlations. Additionally, the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression were employed to identify the key risk factors associated with depression. The factors identified were then used to construct the risk prediction nomogram. Finally, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the discriminative performance of the model. Results: Multivariable linear regression analysis indicated a strong positive correlation between depression and the TyG index (β: 0.38, 95 % CI: 0.16-0.60, Conclusions: The results of this investigation point to a U-shaped association between depression risk and the TyG index among Americans. Those with a TyG index of over 8.16 are significantly more likely to develop depression. These results suggest a possible causal relationship and emphasize the importance of monitoring the TyG index in depression risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.