ReviewJournal of animal science and technology2024
Exploring the multifaceted factors affecting pork meat quality.
Review in Journal of animal science and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dietary Green Alfalfa Supplementation Reduces Backfat Thickness and Improves Muscle Water-Holding Capacity in Diqing Tibetan Pigs.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Stevia extract improves broiler breast meat quality via regulating the glycerophospholipid metabolism and enhancing endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondrial homeostasis.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Impact of increasing market pig weights in North America: a comprehensive review.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Dietary β-mannanase supplementation and its effect on nutrient utilization and performance in broilers fed energy-reduced diets.Food science of animal resources · 2026Article
- Tissue-specific epigenetic regulation of fat metabolism in pigs through integrated analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression networks.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Hastening meat production: a review of growth promoters for traditional and cultured meat production.Journal of animal science and technology · 2026Review
- Integrated analysis of DNA methylome and transcriptome of the backfat and longissimus dorsi muscle of Chinese-European hybrid pigs.BMC genomics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The significance of pork meat quality extends far beyond mere consumer satisfaction, encompassing crucial aspects such as health and nutrition, economic impact, reputation and branding, food safety, and sustainability within the global food system. Influenced by a multitude of factors, each playing a pivotal role in shaping its sensory attributes and consumer appeal, pork meat quality stands as a cornerstone of the meat industry. Thus, understanding these factors are imperative for ensuring consistent high-quality pork production, aligning with consumer preferences, and elevating overall satisfaction levels. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the diverse factors affecting pork meat quality, including genetic characteristics, rearing systems, feed composition, gender differences, pre-slaughter handling, and meat aging processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.