ArticleCureus2024
Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Among Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Utilization of traditional Chinese medicine services and associated factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC health services research · 2026Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Diabetes mellitus is one of the causes to use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), which can be classified into nutritional, psychological and physical. The study's objective was to estimate the prevalence and pattern of using CAM among patients with diabetes mellitus who followed the endocrine and diabetes center in Taif. Materials and methods A cross-sectional study was carried out in Taif city from 1 June to 31 July 2023 among diabetic patients aged 14 years and above who followed the endocrine and diabetes center. A valid, reliable, English questionnaire was used in data collection. It was composed of three parts: demographic data, diabetes mellitus history and use of CAM. Patients visited the diabetic center during the study period for their regular appointments were selected randomly and interviewed by trained interns and medical students. By using the Raosoft calculator, the minimal sample size was 361. The chi-square test and independent two-sample t-test were used to investigate the association between categorical variables and continuous numerical variables, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to control the confounding effect. Results A total of 361 patients were included. Their age ranged between 14 and 84 (51.2 ± 16.9 years). Females represented 57.6% of them. Overall, more than a quarter (28.3%) reported using CAM, while 22.4% used CAM for treating diabetes in the last 12 months. The majority of patients (97.1%) used herbs, mainly cinnamon (48.5%), fenugreek/helba (31.3%) and rosemary (20.2%). Their main source of information was family and friends (64.7%). A history of improvement of blood sugar reading with CAM was reported by 61.8%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that females were at doubled likelihood to use CAM compared to males (Adjusted odds ratio "AOR" = 2.40; 95% confidence interval "CI": 1.27-4.52, p=0.007). Compared to never-smokers, ex-smokers were more likely to use CAM (AOR=2.87; 95% CI: 1.28-6.43, p=0.010). Conclusion The use of CAM, particularly herbs, to treat diabetes is a relatively common practice among Saudi patients. However, the history of informing treating physicians about CAM was reported by a minority of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.