ArticleBiological psychiatry global open science2024
Predicting Prenatal Depression and Assessing Model Bias Using Machine Learning Models.
Article in Biological psychiatry global open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence technologies in pregnancy and childbirth care: a scoping review from a nursing perspective.Women's health nursing (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Review
- Environmental Stressors, Anemia, and Depressive Symptoms in Pregnancy: Unpacking the Combined Risks.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Building a Machine Learning Model to Predict Postpartum Depression from Electronic Health Records in a Tertiary Care Setting.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Predictive Analysis of Postpartum Depression Using Machine Learning.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prediction of perinatal depression among women in Pakistan using Hybrid RNN-LSTM model.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Cognitive biases: potential behavioral marker for future development of postpartum depression and childbirth-related post-traumatic stress disorder.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- A Decision Tree-Driven IoT systems for improved pre-natal diagnostic accuracy.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Evaluating Bias-Mitigated Predictive Models of Perinatal Mood and Anxiety Disorders.JAMA network open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Perinatal depression is one of the most common medical complications during pregnancy and postpartum period, affecting 10% to 20% of pregnant individuals, with higher rates among Black and Latina women who are also less likely to be diagnosed and treated. Machine learning (ML) models based on electronic medical records (EMRs) have effectively predicted postpartum depression in middle-class White women but have rarely included sufficient proportions of racial/ethnic minorities, which has contributed to biases in ML models. Our goal is to determine whether ML models could predict depression in early pregnancy in racial/ethnic minority women by leveraging EMR data. Methods: We extracted EMRs from a large U.S. urban hospital serving mostly low-income Black and Hispanic women ( Results: Although the best-performing ML model's (elastic net) performance was low (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.61), we identified known perinatal depression risk factors such as unplanned pregnancy and being single and underexplored factors such as self-reported pain, lower prenatal vitamin intake, asthma, carrying a male fetus, and lower platelet levels. Despite the sample comprising mostly low-income minority women (54% Black, 27% Latina), the model performed worse for these communities (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 57% Black, 59% Latina women vs. 64% White women). Conclusions: EMR-based ML models could moderately predict early pregnancy depression but exhibited biased performance against low-income minority women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.