ArticleMedical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran2024
Pleiotropic Bias and Study Design Considerations in Genetic Association Studies.
Article in Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Case-control studies are efficient designs for investigating gene-disease associations. A discovery of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) is that many genetic variants are associated with multiple health outcomes and diseases, a phenomenon known as pleiotropy. We aimed to discuss about pleiotropic bias in genetic association studies. Methods: The opinions of the researchers on the basis of the literature were presented as a critical review. Results: Pleiotropic effect can bias the results of gene-disease association studies if they use individuals with pre-existing diseases as the control group, while the disease in cases and controls have shared genetic markers. The idea supports the conclusion that when the exposure of interest in a case-control study is a genetic marker, the use of controls from diseased cases that share similar genetic markers may increase the risk of pleiotropic effect. However, not manifesting the disease symptoms among controls at the time of recruitment does not guarantee that the individual will not develop the disease of interest in the future. Age-matched disease-free controls may be a better solution in similar situations. Different analytical techniques are also available that can be used to identify pleiotropic effects. Known pleiotropic effects can be searched from various online databases. Conclusion: Pleiotropic effects may result in bias in genetic association studies. Suggestions consist of selecting healthy yet age-matched controls and considering diseases with independent genetic architecture. Checking the related databases is recommended before designing a study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.